I've thought about moving to VPLS tunnels from each tower to the edges to reduce the need for publics on most of the infrastructures, but I'm not sure that really saves me much. I'd then need a /30 for every edge instead of every backhaul.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> To: "af" <af@afmug.com> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:36:22 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing Yep, I think that's what Mike is doing. I skip the /30 most of the time and just use the /29 for everything, because I don't need public IPs on the routers. On Sep 27, 2015 1:29 PM, "Ken Hohhof" < af...@kwisp.com > wrote: Couldn’t you assign a /30 for router-router and OSPF, and a secondary /whatever for managing the radios? Especially if you need to have public IPs for the router interfaces. From: Mathew Howard Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:25 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to me... probably the hangover :P I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way or the other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal with vlans. On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: <blockquote> Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at yesterday, but what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is what I do: 10.1.255.0/29 .1 Router A .2 Radio A .5 Radio B .6 Router B ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Eric Kuhnke" < eric.kuh...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the powerbeam, use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a separate VLAN for management traffic on a unique management IP... for example each unique physical site might use vlan60 for radio management and have a /28 of private space in 10/8 space. The first usable IP in the /28 is used for the gateway, then start numbering your radios starting from the second usable IP. On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: <blockquote> Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Eric Kuhnke" < eric.kuh...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as a /30 , no? What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both sides? Other things like CDP , LDP? On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart" < timreichh...@hometowncable.net > wrote: <blockquote> Mathew I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my backhauls in /29 on each interface I dont know if that would cause any problems. Tim <blockquote> -----Original Message----- From: "Mathew Howard" < mhoward...@gmail.com > To: af < af@afmug.com > Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you running them in PTP mode, or PTMP? On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart < timreichh...@hometowncable.net > wrote: <blockquote> Mathew please tell me how you got it to work because me and justin wilson is having hell of time getting my backhaul link to pass the ospf. Tim <blockquote> -----Original Message----- From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing that makes sense On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz < pkr...@unwiredltd.com > wrote: <blockquote> Links by default now run under WDS.. So they removed the ability to disable it. -PK From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside why did they remove wds? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George Skorup < geo...@cbcast.com > wrote: <blockquote> I don't have any of the ac radios, only M. Does it have Multicast Data - Allow All (check box)? If that's unchecked, then multicast will not be allowed over the RF interface, thus OSPF (which is multicast) will not work. Other than that, are you sure you have MT OSPF configured correctly? If not that, then I have no idea. Kick it in the pants? On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote: <blockquote> so if the multicast filtering can cause ospf not to work correctly? Even there is no option for wds on the newer firmware? Tim -----Original Message----- <blockquote> From: "George Skorup" < geo...@cbcast.com > To: af@afmug.com Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing Does this new 11ac stuff have multicast filtering like the M series? I think it's on the advanced tab. I made that mistake once. On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote: <blockquote> I find you need WDS enabled -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart Sent: Friday, 25 September 2015 12:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing I am having an weird issues with my PowerBeam 5AC 500 with ospf traffic not passing through and I am using these PowerBeam 5AC 500 as backhauls and they are connected to mikrotik. I am running firmware 7.1.4xc and not doing nbma setup. Tim </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. </blockquote> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>
