That's exactly what we do. When we can put the radios on a separate
VLAN, that is great. Otherwise, just make sure the /30 you use for
router<->router is assigned _*before*_ you assign any privates.
Otherwise it messes up the OSPF hello operation.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 9/27/2015 11:29 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
Couldn’t you assign a /30 for router-router and OSPF, and a secondary
/whatever for managing the radios? Especially if you need to have
public IPs for the router interfaces.
*From:* Mathew Howard <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Sunday, September 27, 2015 1:25 PM
*To:* af <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I do it the same as you, but what he's saying makes sense just fine to
me... probably the hangover :P
I don't see that there's really any big advantage to doing it one way
or the other, but it seems a bit simpler to me to not have to deal
with vlans.
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net
<mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
Maybe it's the hangover I have from the wedding I was at
yesterday, but what you're saying doesn't make any sense. This is
what I do:
10.1.255.0/29 <http://10.1.255.0/29>
.1 Router A
.2 Radio A
.5 Radio B
.6 Router B
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com
<mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>>
*To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Saturday, September 26, 2015 6:17:44 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
umm, no? Even with radios that have only one cable like the
powerbeam, use a /30 for OSPF. Have the radios listen on a
separate VLAN for management traffic on a unique management IP...
for example each unique physical site might use vlan60 for radio
management and have a /28 of private space in 10/8 space. The
first usable IP in the /28 is used for the gateway, then start
numbering your radios starting from the second usable IP.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net
<mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
Not when you have two radios to manage in the middle.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com
<mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>>
*To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Friday, September 25, 2015 7:25:12 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not passing
An OSPF PTP link between two routers is usually configured as
a /30 , no?
What are your MTU and other settings on the interfaces on both
sides? Other things like CDP , LDP?
On Sep 25, 2015 4:56 PM, "Tim Reichhart"
<timreichh...@hometowncable.net
<mailto:timreichh...@hometowncable.net>> wrote:
Mathew
I am running my links in PTP mode but I am splitting my
backhauls in /29 on each interface I dont know if that
would cause any problems.
Tim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com
<mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>>
To: af <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: 09/25/15 11:03 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with pbe-5ac-500 not
passing
I didn't do anything - they just worked. Are you
running them in PTP mode, or PTMP?
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Tim Reichhart
<timreichh...@hometowncable.net
<mailto:timreichh...@hometowncable.net>> wrote:
Mathew
please tell me how you got it to work because me
and justin wilson is having hell of time getting
my backhaul link to pass the ospf.
Tim
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: "That One Guy /sarcasm"
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Date: 09/25/15 12:52 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with
pbe-5ac-500 not passing
that makes sense
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Peter Kranz
<pkr...@unwiredltd.com
<mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com>> wrote:
Links by default now run under WDS.. So
they removed the ability to disable it.
-PK
*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf
Of* That One Guy /sarcasm
*Sent:* Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:27 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ospf issues with
pbe-5ac-500 not passing
I'm poking at eoip tunnels with ospf inside
why did they remove wds?
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:11 PM, George
Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com
<mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:
I don't have any of the ac radios,
only M. Does it have Multicast Data -
Allow All (check box)? If that's
unchecked, then multicast will not be
allowed over the RF interface, thus
OSPF (which is multicast) will not work.
Other than that, are you sure you have
MT OSPF configured correctly? If not
that, then I have no idea. Kick it in
the pants?
On 9/24/2015 9:58 PM, Tim Reichhart wrote:
so if the multicast filtering can
cause ospf not to work correctly?
Even there is no option for wds on
the newer firmware?
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: "George Skorup"
<geo...@cbcast.com
<mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>>
To: af@afmug.com
<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Date: 09/24/15 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ospf
issues with pbe-5ac-500 not
passing
Does this new 11ac stuff have
multicast filtering like the M
series? I
think it's on the advanced
tab. I made that mistake once.
On 9/24/2015 9:44 PM, Rhys
Cuff (Latrobe I.T) wrote:
I find you need WDS enabled
-----Original Message-----
From: Af
[mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>]
On Behalf Of Tim Reichhart
Sent: Friday, 25 September
2015 12:32 PM
To: af@afmug.com
<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] ospf
issues with pbe-5ac-500
not passing
I am having an weird
issues with my PowerBeam
5AC 500 with ospf traffic
not passing through and I
am using these PowerBeam
5AC 500 as backhauls and
they are connected to
mikrotik. I am running
firmware 7.1.4xc and not
doing nbma setup.
Tim
--
If you only see yourself as part of the
team but you don't see your team as part
of yourself you have already failed as
part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team
but you don't see your team as part of
yourself you have already failed as part of
the team.
