Ouch, that Farm Futures article is pretty awful. Probably what passes for journalism today.

I hope you weren't too harsh on her. Probably some gig economy writer paid a penny a word or something?


-----Original Message----- From: Rick Harnish
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 6:56 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any of you guys service this guy in the news?

I contacted Peter Maher at Netwurx about the article. They are close. Maybe that is who Matthew Howard works for.

http://www.netwurx.net/wireless-high-speed

I also wrote an email to Jessica Michael at Farm Futures about her lack of knowledge about the Wisp industry yesterday. I haven't heard back from her yet.

http://farmfutures.com/blogs-rural-internet-options-smart-office-10241

Respectfully,

Rick Harnish
Broadband Consultant & Industry Analyst
260-307-4000 cell
Skype: rick.harnish.Twitter: @rharnish


-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 7:43 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any of you guys service this guy in the news?

Contact Ars... have them update the site saying that Wireless can solve a lot of these problems for a fraction of the price. It'll be a good piece they can do
on the wireless industry.  Find the name of the guy who wrote the article.
ahhh his email is  jon.brod...@arstechnica.com



----- Original Message -----
From: "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com>
To: "af" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 7:28:01 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any of you guys service this guy in the news?

I'll just skimmed through the article... We might be able to get there, I'll see if
I can figure out where exactly it is.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Steve <li...@wavedirect.org> wrote:

> Would be a good followup Ars story if someone with a 450 was able to
> hit this guy up with faster than DSL speeds! Good PR for the WISP > industry.
>
>
> http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/09/man-builds-house-then-finds-
ou
> t-cable-internet-will-cost-117000/
>
>


Reply via email to