Oh that's just too fresh.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Jaime Fink <ja...@mimosa.co> wrote:

>
> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Josh Luthman <
> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> Date: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 10:37 AM
> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] B11 copper v fiber
>
> Gigabit is a lot easier at fiber than copper.  At least in my experience.
> I think you'd be a fool to do copper when you can easily do fiber.
>
> Thank for you doing SFP by the way, Mimosa!!!
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Scott Vander Dussen <sc...@velociter.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Mimosa recommends these SFP modules:
>>
>> AFBR-5710APZ
>> <http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Avago-Technologies/AFBR-5710APZ/?qs=%2fha2pyFaduhaC58MVLqFl44%252bx6hS5cz1YhojZqdUVyI7Wp%252bPDPG4Rg%3d%3d>
>> 1.25 GBd MMF Transceiver for Gigabit Ethernet, SFP, Bail de-latch, Ext Temp
>> (-40 to 85C)
>>
>> AFCT-5715ALZ
>> <http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Avago-Technologies/AFCT-5715ALZ/?qs=%2fha2pyFadujhJvt9bnk9ES81EX7WBD7ZrbBItK6kCZLHNEN0X0r%2fGA%3d%3d>
>> 1.25 GBd SMF Transceiver with DMI for Gigabit Ethernet, SFP, Std de-latch,
>> Ext Temp (-40 to 85C)
>>
>> FTLF8519P3BTL
>> <http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Finisar/FTLF8519P3BTL/?qs=%2fha2pyFaduh7nd4n5kIrSHIvC1uJRiq8EwAcMil5upKcc76M2JIwDQ%3d%3d>
>> Fiber Optic Transmitters, Receivers, Transceivers GigE 1x/2x FC, 2.129 Gb/s
>> trnscvr, 550m
>>
>> FTLF1318P3BTL
>> <http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Finisar/FTLF1318P3BTL/?qs=%2fha2pyFaduikXVilIKTQvJhiq4n%2fsUYWQAU7K0qEJnA1f%252bqIw1quUw%3d%3d>
>> Fiber Optic Transmitters, Receivers, Transceivers 1310nmFP GigE 1x FC
>> 1.25Gb/s trnscvr10km
>>
>>
>>
>> Assuming cable length and EMI are not issues, is there any benefit to
>> using fiber over copper?
>>
>>
>>
>> `S
>>
>
>

Reply via email to