I just heard an analysis of the ISIS thing on NPR.  Something to do with the 
Army of Rome and wanting to trigger a grand apocalypse.  They think if they can 
attract a bunch of nations with boots on the ground they can foster the end 
times.  (I may have this wrong, I think that is what they were saying).

From: Ken Hohhof 
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 1:29 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG][WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis français

The cost of WWII is unimaginable to most people today.  3% of the world 
population dead.

I wonder if ISIS is trying to start WWIII.  It would be ironic if they end up 
fighting a two front war against the US and European allies in Iraq, and Russia 
in Syria.  Russia would not have the Siberian winter as an ally though.

From: Mathew Howard 
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 2:04 PM
To: af 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG][WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis français

It seems to have worked okay in Germany and Japan... but that was a bit 
different. otherwise, I can't think of a case where it really ever has worked.


On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

  My simple mind concludes whenever we go somewhere and attempt to alter the 
political landscape by force or dirty tricks it always makes things worse in 
the long run.  Has it ever worked?

  When the people decide to change their situation then there is sometimes 
lasting change.  

  From: Faisal Imtiaz 
  Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 12:38 PM
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis français

  I think you all are missing the point....  When it comes to foreign policy it 
is done with all sides involved, along with the give and take, when things go 
right, everyone stands up and says 'We did it".... when something goes wrong, 
everyone stands up and says.. "He or She did it", and "I told you so otherwise".


  Excuse the language but ... 'We have been F**ing in other Gov. affairs, known 
and unknown for a very long time, and the results of such have consequences 
which linger for a very long time..'.... It is easy to play armchair political 
analysts with a short term view, but the picture changes when the view expands 
with History..."


  case and point... How many here know and realize what is the cause of US  
Iran's rocky relationship..... ? 


  The roots of this is traced back to actions in the 1950's .... 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d'%C3%A9tat

  (read the first sentence carefully, and then think of how you can have a 
conversation with them about democracy )


  While we is the west tend not to have long memories, and stay awake during 
History Classes, those affected, tend not to forget !



  Iraq is a similar deal...that country has Shia majority.... so it is very 
likely that any Democratically elected gov will be tilted towards the Shia's, 
that is not something US & Britain are in favor off, nor the regional Arab 
dictatorships... thus the status quo....





  Regards


  Faisal Imtiaz
  Snappy Internet & Telecom
  7266 SW 48 Street
  Miami, FL 33155
  Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

  Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" <jeffl...@att.net>
    To: af@afmug.com
    Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 2:00:53 PM
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis français

    There are a number of actions, under a pretty wide set of circumstances, 
where the US President can act without Congressional approval.  All Presidents 
push the boundaries.  No one really wants to test the Constitutionality of the 
War Powers Act (it's likely unconstitutional). 

    Jeff Broadwick 
    ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
    312-205-2519 Office
    574-220-7826 Cell
    jbroadw...@converge-tech.com


    On Nov 16, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net> wrote:


      You are half correct. There a number of small facts that you have missed, 
but if you follow the explanation, rightfully so.


      News organizations are in the business of making $. The only report what 
they can sell in that particular market. e.g CNN supplies news feeds to the 
world, it's just not the same news feed that they supply to everyone. News 
feed, for the US is very different what they supply to their 'international 
customers'


      This is true for all of the news broadcasters. 

      BTW, Al Jazeera has been kicked out of many 'Muslim' countries due to 
their coverage and reporting.

      BBC is commissioned by Her Majesty, as such the loyalty to the British 
Empire...




      Here is the part that I don't understand......


      Everything  that I know about the US Gov. System, when it comes to 
foreign policy the President cannot take uni-lateral action...it has to have 
the Congress's blessing..

      So why is it when one is talking about the US's actions, everyone refers 
to it as if the US President is acting like any of the other dictators.


      Is is just a way to dump on a President cause he or she is from the other 
party ? 


      Last time I checked, irrespective of all the rhetoric from Washington, 
all parties were equally responsible for participating in actions which have 
lead to Foreign Policy failure after failure...




      Regards.


      Faisal Imtiaz
      Snappy Internet & Telecom
      7266 SW 48 Street
      Miami, FL 33155
      Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

      Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net



--------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: "Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net>
        To: af@afmug.com
        Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 12:44:40 PM
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis 
français

        News as a disinterested third party, is pretty much dead.  All news 
organizations have a political leaning including BBC, Al Jazeera, and NPR.  In 
many cases it’s not what they report, it’s what they fail to report that is 
just as bad or worse.  BBC rarely reports anything negative about the British 
Government and is as bad as the New York Times about not reporting anything 
negative about a Democrat.  Of course both of them do it, but the amount of 
time or the amount of resources will be far less than the opposite side of the 
side of the issue.  Al Jazeera never reports anything bad about the Muslim or 
Islamic faith and NPR is almost as bad as the BBC when it comes to never saying 
anything about a liberal government.  I think NBC, CBS, and ABC have the same 
advisor telling them what negative information not to report on Obama for 
example.  As for NPR, they lost all credibility with me when they fired Juan 
Williams because he said something their management didn’t like and he is a 
huge liberal.



        There is an argument now that Google can pretty much influence an 
election by a huge amount by pushing positive news information in their search 
engine about their liberal candidate up while simultaneously doing the same 
thing in a negative light towards a Conservative candidate. 



        At this point, it’s pretty much up to us to watch news organizations 
from both sides of the aisle and try to sort out the truth.  



        Rory



        From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul McCall
        Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 8:11 AM
        To: af@afmug.com
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis 
français



        +1.  Since we have a pretty good idea of what slant that CNN and 
Foxnews will put on things without looking, respectively, I just glance at that 
both once in a while.  BBC is a good choice.



        Paul



        From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
        Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 9:34 AM
        To: af@afmug.com
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis 
français



        BBC is good.  Al Jazeera is surprisingly informative and seems to lack 
spin.  

        I listen to NPR continually.



        Card carrying GOP but am truly libertarian, cannot vote demo primarily 
due to guns and the abortion issue.



        Fox news is like eating a whole bag of halloween candy.  After watching 
fox I have to watch some Rachael Maddow to be able to drive straight again. 

        (In reality, I avoid TV news.  Radio and Google News is were most of my 
disinformation comes from).



        I don’t like apologists, religious or otherwise.  I like the best 
truths I can find.  

        I really hate partisan politics.  Blood sport all based on pride and 
self aggrandizement.  Does nothing for the people.  



        From: Glen Waldrop 

        Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 7:20 AM

        To: af@afmug.com 

        Subject: Re: [AFMUG][WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis français



        You're right on one thing, politics is not as cut and dried as all of 
that.

        Obama is a jackass.

        Fox news is far from perfect.

        As a businessman though I recommend not calling your potential 
customers dumb though. Fox may be a group of liars, but at this point in time 
they are the least biased news source in the US (50% biased vs 100%). Pretty 
much all of the rest of them are brown nosing the left so bad I can't see how 
they haven't suffocated themselves.

        When I want news with little BS I tend to lean towards BBC myself.





          ----- Original Message ----- 

          From: Patrick Leary 

          To: af@afmug.com 

          Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 7:24 AM

          Subject: Re: [AFMUG][WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis 
français



          The world is such a simple place when everything is Obama’s fault.



          Somebody smashes a glass to the ground. 12 years later, people 
blinded by partisanship blame the person who tried to glue some of the pieces 
back together, but the glass still won’t hold water so it must be his fault. 
Extremely disordered cognitive functioning.



          …Never mind the real subtleties all the “informed” people on the 
Right seem to forget, chief among them that the IRAQI POLITICIANS SAID THE ONLY 
WAY WE COULD KEEP OUR TROOPS IN COUNTRY WAS TO REMOVE THEIR IMMUNITY AND MAKE 
THEM SUBJECT TO LIABILITY AND PROSECUTION. No one on this side of the pond 
wanted that, from the DoD to BOTH parties. Of course, FOX viewers either are 
too dumb to know this or intentionally pretend that was not the reality, in 
order to take yet another “it’s Obama’s fault” grade school insult. It’s just 
way more satisfying or simpler for their juvenile world view to believe “it’s 
Obama’s fault!” What, are you 10 years old?



          
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/05/world/middleeast/iraqis-say-no-to-immunity-for-remaining-american-troops.html?_r=0



          People really need to educate themselves before spewing childish 
partisan memes.



          Patrick



          From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway
          Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 8:53 AM
          To: af@afmug.com
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis 
français



          We had our chance to stop it in Iraq, we cut and run.  



          And you are right, we didn’t do the right bombing in Vietnam to stop 
that war.  And what Ford did at the end is the lesson Obama should have learned 
which could have prevented much of what happened in the Middle East including 
ISIS.  Apparently they didn’t teach history to at Harvard.  Imagine the 
influence a multi-cultural and stable Iraqi government would have had on the 
region.



          Rory



          From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman
          Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2015 6:31 AM
          To: af@afmug.com
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis 
français



          Collateral damage is highly underrated. Vietnam had no wholesale 
bombing like WWII. that is one reason Vietnam, and the rest of these conflicts, 
last so long. 
          The horror of war has to be brought to everyone, including those 
making the decisions, to bring it to an end.

          But having said that, this Muslim extremists movement has been been 
going on for about 700 years so it may be to much to expect to be out of war 
again. There may be a lull, but I think the entire world has been drawn into 
the middle East quagmire.

          The primary cause damn sure isn't a two degrees warming tend in a 
couple decades.



          On Sun, Nov 15, 2015, 7:05 AM Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> 
wrote:

            The problem is that they are basically imbedded with civilians.   
How do you kill them without taking out everyone else.  That is the problem we 
have had all along.  Door-to-door warfare is all that you can do but it’s also 
the most dangerous for our soldiers and nobody is going to allow wholesale 
bombing like Nixon did in Vietnam.  



            We also burned a lot of good will in all the countries we need to 
do this with when we got the local civilians to act as translators and 
informants and abandoned them after the war, the highest profile of them the 
doctor in Pakistan.  Even he is still in jail years later but the reality is, 
nobody trusts us any more in those regions.  We are not a reliable ally. 



            Rory



            From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
            Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 11:06 AM
            To: Animal Farm <af@afmug.com>


            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis 
français



            as much as i hate war and killing....I agree we need to make a 
parking lot out of them...




            Jaime Solorza

            Wireless Systems Architect

            915-861-1390



            On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> 
wrote:

              The more of this that happens, the more the rest of the world 
will unite to rub them out.  I am a hopeless optimist.  



              From: Jaime Solorza 

              Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 7:52 AM

              To: Animal Farm 

              Subject: Re: [AFMUG][WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis 
français



              Yes. I am praying for them and the world.   What a tragedy.. It 
is beyond barbaric..its evil for the sake of evil. 

              Jaime Solorza

              On Nov 13, 2015 10:15 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" 
<fai...@snappytelecom.net> wrote:



                Oui , et pas seulement cela , nos cœurs et nos prières pour 
tous ceux qui sont touchés par cette Sensless actes brabaric .



                Faisal Imtiaz

                Snappy Internet & Telecom
                7266 SW 48 Street
                Miami, FL 33155
                Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

                Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: 
supp...@snappytelecom.net




----------------------------------------------------------------

                  From: "Patrick Leary" <patrick.le...@telrad.com>
                  To: "WISPA General List" <wirel...@wispa.org>, "Telrad List" 
<tel...@wispa.org>, af@afmug.com, memb...@canwisp.ca
                  Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 7:46:29 PM
                  Subject: [WISPA] S'il vous plaît priez pour nos amis français

                  Tonght, chaque personne libre est un Parisien.



                  Patrick Leary

                  Telrad





                  
************************************************************************************
                  This footnote confirms that this email message has been 
scanned by
                  PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, 
vandals & computer viruses.
                  
************************************************************************************


                  _______________________________________________
                  Wireless mailing list
                  wirel...@wispa.org
                  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless







          
************************************************************************************
          This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
          PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & 
computer viruses.
          
************************************************************************************





          
************************************************************************************
          This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
          PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & 
computer viruses.
          
************************************************************************************



Reply via email to