stop making sense Chuck....it makes head blow up

Jaime Solorza
Wireless Systems Architect
915-861-1390

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> It more than cut my power bill in half.
>
> *From:* Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
> *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2015 12:09 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>
>
> It might have been reasonable until Perovskite was announced.  It will
> have an ROI in months.
>
>
>
> For me, a grid-tie system doesn’t make sense with the additional fees and
> the difference in wholesale/retail, especially with an electric car that is
> only home at night.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard
> *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2015 11:53 AM
> *To:* af
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>
>
>
> even at 7-11 years, that isn't that unreasonable, since they should have
> quite a bit longer life span than that... and you don't need any storage
> with a grid-tie system.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
> wrote:
>
> Did you buy it wholesale and build it yourself?  The average installation
> commercially or through any of the solar companies is 7-11 years.  Also,
> what are you doing for storage?
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Chuck McCown
> *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2015 11:43 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>
>
>
> I love my solar panels and the payback is about 4 years.
>
>
>
> *From:* Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net>
>
> *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2015 11:15 AM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>
>
>
> The two biggest problems with Wind Farms besides the eyesore (actually I
> think they look cool) is noise and bird deaths.  Never been a fan of them
> though.
>
>
>
> Right now I’m against taxpayer subsidized solar for three reasons, the ROI
> is ridiculous, and better/cheaper technologies are right around the corner
> (100 times cheaper and ROI’s of months, not years), and there is no
> cost-effective storage medium that is going to last more than a few years
> (Lithium batteries are expensive and will fail within 3-8 years or at least
> be heavily degraded).  When Perovskite panels come out with sodium
> batteries or one of several other technologies that don’t start degrading
> after 18 months, I’m onboard.
>
>
>
> As for people against technology that could better their lives.  I’m more
> worried about the ones that won’t teach proven science for religious
> reasons.  You can teach science and morality without ignoring the science.
> Tolerance of ignorance never a good thing.
>
>
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
> Behalf Of *Mathew Howard
> *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2015 9:58 AM
> *To:* af
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>
>
>
> As far as I can see all the crazy sucking the energy up and causing cancer
> type comments all came from two people (who were not council members)...
> who happen to share the same last name.
>
> It sounds like the reason they voted to reject it was because the
> residents didn't want it there... which is kind of the town council should
> be doing, whether their reasons for wanting it there are logical or not
> isn't entirely relevant. Most of the objections appear to have been that it
> would be an eyesore... on the other hand, if the majority of the residents
> did want it to happen, and the town council was just persuaded to turn it
> down because of a couple of nutcases ranting, they should (and probably
> will) be voted out in the next election.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Jay Weekley <par...@cyberbroadband.net>
> wrote:
>
> I really didn't gather the full reason they banned the solar farm from the
> article.  True, two citizens that made comments were nuts but you find that
> anywhere.
>
> Patrick Leary wrote:
>
>
> Even worse Rory, because then you have many people who claim to know the
> meaning of these labels but they are simply incorrect and are repeating
> sound bites, and/or misapply them as a matter of course, even in
> contradiction without a trace of irony.
>
> …e.g., “Obama is a follower of Reverend Wright!!!,” but is also a Kenyan
> born Muslim.
>
> Go figure. It’s the death of critical thinking in this country. It has
> spawned lots of ignorance. Did you know an elected city zoning board in
> Woodland, NC just banned a solar farm on the grounds that it would steal
> too much of the sun’s energy, thus putting photosynthesis of plants and
> crops at risk? Yeah, that just happened in the U.S.A….in 2015.
>
>
> http://www.roanoke-chowannewsherald.com/2015/12/08/woodland-rejects-solar-farm/
>
> Patrick
>
> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:32 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>
> I think that was misunderstood.  My point was, regardless of the
> candidates, is that the vast majority of voters simply don’t know the
> facts, don’t care about the facts, and are not prepared to provide a vote
> that is based on research and education.  I can ask 10 people what the
> Trans Pacific Partnership was about and 10 of them won’t have a clue. Show
> a picture of Biden to 10 people and I’d be surprised if 8 of them recognize
> him and his position in the government. Most of them don’t have any idea of
> our country’s history, could tell you the difference between Democracy,
> Socialism, and Communism, or even know who fought in World Wars, the Civil
> War, or even which side won.  The fact is, even with all the resources
> available to the public today, the average voter is more ignorant today
> than in the past.  The all know the Kardashians but few of them could name
> off their Senators or Congressman.  This isn’t partisan, this is the state
> of our country today.  Picking out supporters of any candidate for being
> ignorant is trite when the entire electorate is clueless.
>
> Rory
>
> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 13, 2015 6:19 PM
> *To:* Animal Farm
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>
> Not trying to offend anyone  on list....I get kick out of all mayhem on
> news...but if you do get offended....I can only say.   If the  shoe
> fits...don't take it off.
>
> On Dec 13, 2015 6:08 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com <mailto:
> part15...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> It's actually a sign of great intelligence to simultaneously hold two
> opposite opinions at the same time.
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
> On 12/13/2015 5:02 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>
>     I think calling people ignorant because they support an opposing
>     candidate is over simplification and pretty ignorant itself.
>     Trump is appealing to the base fears and anger for a large number
>     of people who believe nobody else is addressing th those concerns.
>     I had to laugh today. I saw  some consultant interviewing a bunch
>     Trump supporters. Some lady said she didn't like Obama because he
>     was arrogant and thought to much of himself. I thought, "wait a
>     second. You are a trump supporter?" Doesn't Trump have nearly the
>     entire market cornered on that trait?
>
>     On Sun, Dec 13, 2015, 6:50 PM Jaime Solorza
>     <losguyswirel...@gmail.com <mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         And I like  Mickey Mouse's voice much better compared to Cruz
>         or Trumps...
>
>         On Dec 13, 2015 5:44 PM, "Jaime Solorza"
>         <losguyswirel...@gmail.com <mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>>
>         wrote:
>
>         Lets fact check Rory....lol
>
>         On Dec 13, 2015 5:03 PM, "Rory Conaway"
>         <r...@triadwireless.net <mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>> wrote:
>
>         Really, and Hillary supporters don’t even acknowledge she sold
>         influence in that State Department for billions and took
>         hundreds of millions for bogus speeches. All candidates have
>         followers that really don’t know what’s going on so singling
>         out Trump is bogus if you don’t add the voters who thought
>         Obama was going to pay their mortgage (that was a real
>         Einstein moment).  With 90% of the people not even knowing who
>         the vice-president is, you can always find idiots who will
>         vote for Mickey Mouse if he said he was for some hot political
>         topic.
>
>         Rory
>
>         *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
>         <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
>         *Sent:* Sunday, December 13, 2015 3:10 PM
>         *To:* Animal Farm
>         *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>
>         The scary  thing Stefan is not Trump as much as his
>         followers...when they are interviewed it reminds how narrow
>         minded they are...they think professional wrestling is real
>         among other things  but I might offend some on list...
>
>         On Dec 13, 2015 2:26 PM, "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net
>         <mailto:s...@genias.net>> wrote:
>
>         I said foreign view :-). We have very different laws and
>         thoughts on privacy. Our politicians are allowed to keep more
>         privacy. In such a case the private emails would not be open
>         to a broad audience. I did not say she followed US rules.
>
>         -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
>         Von: Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com
>         <mailto:lewis.berg...@gmail.com>>
>         Datum: 13.12.2015 21:40 (GMT+01:00)
>         An: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
>         Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] OT weekend edition: Lies, Lies, Lies
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
> viruses.
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer
> viruses.
>
> ************************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to