Ok, I popped the lid here... after realizing it's able to be opened withoud
desoldering.  I take it back... There are several 33.2 Ohm resistors which
are wired suspiciously like heaters....  This now is starting to make some
sense.

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
li...@packetflux.com> wrote:

> Darn FCC site... expires links way too quickly.
>
> The SM pictures look like they MIGHT have one.
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
> li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
>
>> I remember hearing the same thing, which is why I went looking at the
>> photos.  See
>> https://apps.fcc.gov/eas/GetApplicationAttachment.html?id=2053606
>>
>> There aren't any that I can see, even under the cans.   I thought that
>> perhaps looking at the actual board would reveal some, but I sure don't see
>> any.    On the SM perhaps?
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> They have said there's a resistive heater.  I heard it in ePMP training
>>> in Albany and I've seen it stated on this list.
>>>
>>> If I remember correctly (I might not), they wanted the CPU to hit a
>>> certain temp before starting up.  If it was too cold you'd see a delay in
>>> startup of up to 2 minutes while waiting for this heater to bring the CPU
>>> up to temp.  I've never actually observed the delay, so I guess they're
>>> talking about Alaska cold, not NY cold.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/21/2016 10:47 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
>>>
>>> I looked at the high resolution photos on the FCC site and didn't see
>>> anything obvious.  Now I've got the one I have on the bench out of the
>>> case, I still don't see anything obvious heater-wise, but again I'm not
>>> going to pop the shields off the board (requiring desoldering), to be 100%
>>> sure...
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Steve D <bigd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just throwing this out there, but don't the epmp's have a small heater
>>>> in them that could be turning on when it's cold, drawing additional power?
>>>> I recall it was supposed to pre-heat components to avoid freezeup on first
>>>> boot but I can't recall if that's the only time they run or not.
>>>>
>>>> -Steve D
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
>>>> li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I do want to clarify one item:
>>>>>
>>>>> This is not necessarily related to the cambium DRAM issue.   I don't
>>>>> want to claim that problem, since this isn't the same thing.   This is 
>>>>> more
>>>>> of an issue where you have ePMP's which seem to start having power-related
>>>>> issues.   If moving to a 30V brick makes your problem go away, then the
>>>>> issue I describe below probably is your issue.  If moving to a higher
>>>>> voltage doesn't fix the issue then this probably doesn't relate to your
>>>>> issue.  Regardless, it is my intent to recommend that my customers move to
>>>>> 48V as soon as I confirm that this seems to fix at least a decent number 
>>>>> of
>>>>> the problems without causing others.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately this might be a case of the cold weather aggravating two
>>>>> separate issues (or for that matter, the cold weather causing increased
>>>>> current consumption in the ePMP, which then requires a higher voltage to
>>>>> operate correctly).
>>>>>
>>>>> -forrest
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
>>>>> <li...@packetflux.com>li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> A bit of an update from the PacketFlux side.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Late this afternoon I received a ticket from Tyson in relation to
>>>>>> these issues.  In particular, sync from a PacketFlux SyncInjector 
>>>>>> dropping
>>>>>> off on an ePMP when it's cold.  I have spent a bit of time this evening
>>>>>> investigating this issue.  The following is a summary of what I found.
>>>>>> It's a bit long-winded so that those experiencing the problems can
>>>>>> understand my current working theory and help me figure out if this is 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WARNING:  The following is based on a limited amount of testing with
>>>>>> a single ePMP with no traffic and no clients and on a bench.   This is
>>>>>> likely the best case scenario.  The field is only going to be worse.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The setup is as follows:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ePMP 1000 GPS AP, with no GPS hockey puck attached, connected to a
>>>>>> Gigabit Syncinjector (Rev H and Rev I - I have a special one with a port 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> each 'type' ;-) ).   I am powering the injector with a variable power
>>>>>> supply so I can vary the voltages in.  The AP is connected to the 
>>>>>> Injector
>>>>>> with ~100m of CAT5 cable.   The Antenna connectors have terminators on
>>>>>> them, the AP is in transmit mode, but isn't passing any traffic since 
>>>>>> there
>>>>>> are no clients.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When feeding the injector with 24V, I get about 23V at the AP.   This
>>>>>> is pretty consistent with what I would expect in this situation.   The AP
>>>>>> seems to work fine, at least on the bench and without doing any real
>>>>>> work.   However, as the voltage drops, things start to get weird:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At around 22V in, (21V at the AP), Sync becomes flaky.  This is
>>>>>> consistent on both H and I version ports on the injector.    Sometimes it
>>>>>> works, sometimes it doesn't.   Note that 22V is the bottom of the rated
>>>>>> voltage inputs for the ePMP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At around 20.5V in (19.5V at the AP), the radio just turns off.   It
>>>>>> won't turn back on until around 22V.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now here's where some total speculation comes to play.   On the
>>>>>> bench, this unit is drawing around 3W.  Let's assume that under load, and
>>>>>> when temperatures are cold, this unit draws closer to 6W.  This would
>>>>>> double the current, and quadruple the voltage drop.  Now, assume 24V in,
>>>>>> this puts you at around 20V in at the AP, which is about the turnoff
>>>>>> point.   Remember this is on 100m of wire, and a total speculation about 
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> the power draw of a cold, under load AP.  But the point is valid,
>>>>>> regardless of the cause - if the circuit resistance when combined with 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> power load causes a low enough voltage at the AP, weird things will
>>>>>> happen.  And since weird things seem to start to happen around 22V, there
>>>>>> just isn't much headroom at 24V.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This explains why things work well at 30V.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For those who are having this problem I'd recommend trying increasing
>>>>>> the voltage into the SyncInjector.   The Revision H injectors can safely
>>>>>> handle up to around 56V or so.   Assuming all of the radios on an 
>>>>>> injector
>>>>>> are either ePMP or the newer 450i's, using 56V into a SyncInjector is
>>>>>> perfectly acceptable and the ePMP's are rated up to 56V as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the summary:   Try a 48VDC voltage source instead of 24V and see
>>>>>> what happens.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -forrest
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Tyson Burris @ Internet
>>>>>> Communications Inc < <t...@franklinisp.net>t...@franklinisp.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello Cambium,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At the MidWest-IX launch party last night, several of us Indiana
>>>>>>> WISPs compared notes on the ‘cold weather’ problems we are seeing with
>>>>>>> ePMPs.  It was very interesting to learn we are experience identical
>>>>>>> problems across the spectrum.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We all understand this is a DRAM issue with certain units you have
>>>>>>> identified.  We also understand the firmware RC that has been made
>>>>>>> available to fix this short term.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The bottom line is we are very frustrated and grow tired of dealing
>>>>>>> with it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our concern is simple.  If your software fix ‘degrades’ the
>>>>>>> performance of the product or triggers other issues, as it has been
>>>>>>> suggested, we would prefer a full recall and replacement program
>>>>>>> immediately.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If the suggestion that the fix will degrade the product performance
>>>>>>> is inaccurate and not cause other issues, I would like for this to be 
>>>>>>> made
>>>>>>> public.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Tyson Burris, President*
>>>>>>> *Internet Communications Inc.*
>>>>>>> *739 Commerce Dr.*
>>>>>>> *Franklin, IN 46131*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #*
>>>>>>> *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #*
>>>>>>> *Online: * <http://www.surfici.net>*www.surfici.net
>>>>>>> <http://www.surfici.net>*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [image: ICI]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *What can ICI do for you?*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh
>>>>>>> Wifi/Hotzones - IP Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the*
>>>>>>> *addressee shown. It contains information that is*
>>>>>>> *confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,*
>>>>>>> *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by*
>>>>>>> *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly*
>>>>>>> *prohibited.*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>>>>>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>>>>>> <forre...@imach.com>forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>>>>>> <http://facebook.com/packetflux>  <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>>>>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>>>>> <forre...@imach.com>forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>>>>> <http://facebook.com/packetflux>  <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>>> <forre...@imach.com>forre...@imach.com |  <http://www.packetflux.com/>
>>> http://www.packetflux.com
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>>> <http://facebook.com/packetflux>  <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>> <http://facebook.com/packetflux>  <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
>   <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>
>


-- 
*Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>  <http://facebook.com/packetflux>
<http://twitter.com/@packetflux>

Reply via email to