Most quality industrial DC power supplies are adjustable and designed for
wide range of temps.  Just saying
On Jan 21, 2016 8:30 AM, "Steve D" <bigd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Just throwing this out there, but don't the epmp's have a small heater in
> them that could be turning on when it's cold, drawing additional power?  I
> recall it was supposed to pre-heat components to avoid freezeup on first
> boot but I can't recall if that's the only time they run or not.
>
> -Steve D
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
> li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
>
>> I do want to clarify one item:
>>
>> This is not necessarily related to the cambium DRAM issue.   I don't want
>> to claim that problem, since this isn't the same thing.   This is more of
>> an issue where you have ePMP's which seem to start having power-related
>> issues.   If moving to a 30V brick makes your problem go away, then the
>> issue I describe below probably is your issue.  If moving to a higher
>> voltage doesn't fix the issue then this probably doesn't relate to your
>> issue.  Regardless, it is my intent to recommend that my customers move to
>> 48V as soon as I confirm that this seems to fix at least a decent number of
>> the problems without causing others.
>>
>> Unfortunately this might be a case of the cold weather aggravating two
>> separate issues (or for that matter, the cold weather causing increased
>> current consumption in the ePMP, which then requires a higher voltage to
>> operate correctly).
>>
>> -forrest
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
>> li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
>>
>>> A bit of an update from the PacketFlux side.
>>>
>>> Late this afternoon I received a ticket from Tyson in relation to these
>>> issues.  In particular, sync from a PacketFlux SyncInjector dropping off on
>>> an ePMP when it's cold.  I have spent a bit of time this evening
>>> investigating this issue.  The following is a summary of what I found.
>>> It's a bit long-winded so that those experiencing the problems can
>>> understand my current working theory and help me figure out if this is the
>>> case.
>>>
>>> WARNING:  The following is based on a limited amount of testing with a
>>> single ePMP with no traffic and no clients and on a bench.   This is likely
>>> the best case scenario.  The field is only going to be worse.
>>>
>>> The setup is as follows:
>>>
>>> ePMP 1000 GPS AP, with no GPS hockey puck attached, connected to a
>>> Gigabit Syncinjector (Rev H and Rev I - I have a special one with a port of
>>> each 'type' ;-) ).   I am powering the injector with a variable power
>>> supply so I can vary the voltages in.  The AP is connected to the Injector
>>> with ~100m of CAT5 cable.   The Antenna connectors have terminators on
>>> them, the AP is in transmit mode, but isn't passing any traffic since there
>>> are no clients.
>>>
>>> When feeding the injector with 24V, I get about 23V at the AP.   This is
>>> pretty consistent with what I would expect in this situation.   The AP
>>> seems to work fine, at least on the bench and without doing any real
>>> work.   However, as the voltage drops, things start to get weird:
>>>
>>> At around 22V in, (21V at the AP), Sync becomes flaky.  This is
>>> consistent on both H and I version ports on the injector.    Sometimes it
>>> works, sometimes it doesn't.   Note that 22V is the bottom of the rated
>>> voltage inputs for the ePMP.
>>>
>>> At around 20.5V in (19.5V at the AP), the radio just turns off.   It
>>> won't turn back on until around 22V.
>>>
>>> Now here's where some total speculation comes to play.   On the bench,
>>> this unit is drawing around 3W.  Let's assume that under load, and when
>>> temperatures are cold, this unit draws closer to 6W.  This would double the
>>> current, and quadruple the voltage drop.  Now, assume 24V in, this puts you
>>> at around 20V in at the AP, which is about the turnoff point.   Remember
>>> this is on 100m of wire, and a total speculation about a the power draw of
>>> a cold, under load AP.  But the point is valid, regardless of the cause -
>>> if the circuit resistance when combined with the power load causes a low
>>> enough voltage at the AP, weird things will happen.  And since weird things
>>> seem to start to happen around 22V, there just isn't much headroom at
>>> 24V.
>>>
>>> This explains why things work well at 30V.
>>>
>>> For those who are having this problem I'd recommend trying increasing
>>> the voltage into the SyncInjector.   The Revision H injectors can safely
>>> handle up to around 56V or so.   Assuming all of the radios on an injector
>>> are either ePMP or the newer 450i's, using 56V into a SyncInjector is
>>> perfectly acceptable and the ePMP's are rated up to 56V as well.
>>>
>>> So the summary:   Try a 48VDC voltage source instead of 24V and see what
>>> happens.
>>>
>>> -forrest
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications
>>> Inc <t...@franklinisp.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Cambium,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> At the MidWest-IX launch party last night, several of us Indiana WISPs
>>>> compared notes on the ‘cold weather’ problems we are seeing with ePMPs.  It
>>>> was very interesting to learn we are experience identical problems across
>>>> the spectrum.
>>>>
>>>> We all understand this is a DRAM issue with certain units you have
>>>> identified.  We also understand the firmware RC that has been made
>>>> available to fix this short term.
>>>>
>>>> The bottom line is we are very frustrated and grow tired of dealing
>>>> with it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Our concern is simple.  If your software fix ‘degrades’ the performance
>>>> of the product or triggers other issues, as it has been suggested, we would
>>>> prefer a full recall and replacement program immediately.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If the suggestion that the fix will degrade the product performance is
>>>> inaccurate and not cause other issues, I would like for this to be made
>>>> public.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Tyson Burris, President*
>>>> *Internet Communications Inc.*
>>>> *739 Commerce Dr.*
>>>> *Franklin, IN 46131*
>>>>
>>>> *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #*
>>>> *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #*
>>>> *Online: **www.surfici.net* <http://www.surfici.net>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [image: ICI]
>>>>
>>>> *What can ICI do for you?*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones -
>>>> IP Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.*
>>>>
>>>> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the*
>>>> *addressee shown. It contains information that is*
>>>> *confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,*
>>>> *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by*
>>>> *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly*
>>>> *prohibited.*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>>> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>>> <http://facebook.com/packetflux>  <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>> <http://facebook.com/packetflux>  <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to