Nice, thank you for doing the test and posting the results!  I think this
sort of confirms what we were all thinking.



On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Andy Trimmell <atrimm...@precisionds.com>
wrote:

> So I did some testing today by freezing the AP in the freezer. Heater warm
> up varied between 1 minute and 3 minutes. The amps per unit during the heat
> up time is .45 amps per AP. We were finding that even if its warmed up and
> you unplug it 10 seconds later it will warm up again and again.  After the
> warm up the AP drops its amps to .2 amps.  We are using 2.1amp psu to feed
> several APs because we never use more than that but I think when these
> heaters get turned on during the bootup process we exceed it and overload
> the psu.
>
>
>
> This was all ran into Packetflux gear with a SOLA power supply 2.1Amp.
> We’re going to split the load so if there’s a power blip where the backup
> doesn’t catch it in time all 3 aren’t starting up heaters at the same time.
>
>
>
> Hope this information helps.
>
>
>
> -Andy
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *ch...@wbmfg.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:03 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] To Cambium With Love - Replace the bad ePMP units.
>
>
>
> Or automotive grade.
>
>
>
> *From:* Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com>
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 21, 2016 9:15 AM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] To Cambium With Love - Replace the bad ePMP units.
>
>
>
> Or here’s a thought:  pay the money for industrial temperature range parts!
>
>
>
> *From:* Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 21, 2016 10:08 AM
>
> *To:* af@afmug.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] To Cambium With Love - Replace the bad ePMP units.
>
>
>
> They have said there's a resistive heater.  I heard it in ePMP training in
> Albany and I've seen it stated on this list.
>
> If I remember correctly (I might not), they wanted the CPU to hit a
> certain temp before starting up.  If it was too cold you'd see a delay in
> startup of up to 2 minutes while waiting for this heater to bring the CPU
> up to temp.  I've never actually observed the delay, so I guess they're
> talking about Alaska cold, not NY cold.
>
> On 1/21/2016 10:47 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
>
> I looked at the high resolution photos on the FCC site and didn't see
> anything obvious.  Now I've got the one I have on the bench out of the
> case, I still don't see anything obvious heater-wise, but again I'm not
> going to pop the shields off the board (requiring desoldering), to be 100%
> sure...
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Steve D <bigd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Just throwing this out there, but don't the epmp's have a small heater in
> them that could be turning on when it's cold, drawing additional power?  I
> recall it was supposed to pre-heat components to avoid freezeup on first
> boot but I can't recall if that's the only time they run or not.
>
>
>
> -Steve D
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
> li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
>
> I do want to clarify one item:
>
> This is not necessarily related to the cambium DRAM issue.   I don't want
> to claim that problem, since this isn't the same thing.   This is more of
> an issue where you have ePMP's which seem to start having power-related
> issues.   If moving to a 30V brick makes your problem go away, then the
> issue I describe below probably is your issue.  If moving to a higher
> voltage doesn't fix the issue then this probably doesn't relate to your
> issue.  Regardless, it is my intent to recommend that my customers move to
> 48V as soon as I confirm that this seems to fix at least a decent number of
> the problems without causing others.
>
> Unfortunately this might be a case of the cold weather aggravating two
> separate issues (or for that matter, the cold weather causing increased
> current consumption in the ePMP, which then requires a higher voltage to
> operate correctly).
>
> -forrest
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:43 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
> li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
>
> A bit of an update from the PacketFlux side.
>
> Late this afternoon I received a ticket from Tyson in relation to these
> issues.  In particular, sync from a PacketFlux SyncInjector dropping off on
> an ePMP when it's cold.  I have spent a bit of time this evening
> investigating this issue.  The following is a summary of what I found.
> It's a bit long-winded so that those experiencing the problems can
> understand my current working theory and help me figure out if this is the
> case.
>
> WARNING:  The following is based on a limited amount of testing with a
> single ePMP with no traffic and no clients and on a bench.   This is likely
> the best case scenario.  The field is only going to be worse.
>
> The setup is as follows:
>
> ePMP 1000 GPS AP, with no GPS hockey puck attached, connected to a Gigabit
> Syncinjector (Rev H and Rev I - I have a special one with a port of each
> 'type' ;-) ).   I am powering the injector with a variable power supply so
> I can vary the voltages in.  The AP is connected to the Injector with ~100m
> of CAT5 cable.   The Antenna connectors have terminators on them, the AP is
> in transmit mode, but isn't passing any traffic since there are no clients.
>
> When feeding the injector with 24V, I get about 23V at the AP.   This is
> pretty consistent with what I would expect in this situation.   The AP
> seems to work fine, at least on the bench and without doing any real
> work.   However, as the voltage drops, things start to get weird:
>
> At around 22V in, (21V at the AP), Sync becomes flaky.  This is consistent
> on both H and I version ports on the injector.    Sometimes it works,
> sometimes it doesn't.   Note that 22V is the bottom of the rated voltage
> inputs for the ePMP.
>
> At around 20.5V in (19.5V at the AP), the radio just turns off.   It won't
> turn back on until around 22V.
>
> Now here's where some total speculation comes to play.   On the bench,
> this unit is drawing around 3W.  Let's assume that under load, and when
> temperatures are cold, this unit draws closer to 6W.  This would double the
> current, and quadruple the voltage drop.  Now, assume 24V in, this puts you
> at around 20V in at the AP, which is about the turnoff point.   Remember
> this is on 100m of wire, and a total speculation about a the power draw of
> a cold, under load AP.  But the point is valid, regardless of the cause -
> if the circuit resistance when combined with the power load causes a low
> enough voltage at the AP, weird things will happen.  And since weird things
> seem to start to happen around 22V, there just isn't much headroom at
> 24V.
>
> This explains why things work well at 30V.
>
> For those who are having this problem I'd recommend trying increasing the
> voltage into the SyncInjector.   The Revision H injectors can safely handle
> up to around 56V or so.   Assuming all of the radios on an injector are
> either ePMP or the newer 450i's, using 56V into a SyncInjector is perfectly
> acceptable and the ePMP's are rated up to 56V as well.
>
> So the summary:   Try a 48VDC voltage source instead of 24V and see what
> happens.
>
> -forrest
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications
> Inc <t...@franklinisp.net> wrote:
>
> Hello Cambium,
>
>
>
> At the MidWest-IX launch party last night, several of us Indiana WISPs
> compared notes on the ‘cold weather’ problems we are seeing with ePMPs.  It
> was very interesting to learn we are experience identical problems across
> the spectrum.
>
> We all understand this is a DRAM issue with certain units you have
> identified.  We also understand the firmware RC that has been made
> available to fix this short term.
>
> The bottom line is we are very frustrated and grow tired of dealing with
> it.
>
>
>
> Our concern is simple.  If your software fix ‘degrades’ the performance of
> the product or triggers other issues, as it has been suggested, we would
> prefer a full recall and replacement program immediately.
>
>
>
> If the suggestion that the fix will degrade the product performance is
> inaccurate and not cause other issues, I would like for this to be made
> public.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> *Tyson Burris, President*
> *Internet Communications Inc.*
> *739 Commerce Dr.*
> *Franklin, IN 46131*
>
> *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #*
> *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #*
> *Online: **www.surfici.net <http://www.surfici.net>*
>
>
>
> [image: ICI]
>
> *What can ICI do for you?*
>
>
> *Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones - IP
> Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.*
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the*
> *addressee shown. It contains information that is*
> *confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,*
> *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by*
> *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly*
> *prohibited.*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
>
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
>
> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>
>    <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
>
>
>
> -- <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
> *Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>*
>
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
> *forre...@imach.com* | *http://www.packetflux.com*
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
>    <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
>   <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
>
>
>
> -- <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
> *Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>*
>
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
> *forre...@imach.com* | *http://www.packetflux.com*
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
>    <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
>   <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
>
>

Reply via email to