I really have no idea about that. So I need to hire an agent, and then ignore all but the requests that come to me from that agent?
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Justin Wilson <li...@mtin.net> wrote: > The biggest thing I use in a determination is did they send it to the > Registered Copyright Agent on file? You do have one correct? :-) > http://copyright.gov/onlinesp/ > > If you have one, and it’s not sent to that agent, it’s not a real request > IMHO. > > > Justin Wilson > j...@mtin.net > > --- > http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO > xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth > > http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman > > On Feb 2, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > > It can't charge the copyright holder, but could it charge to company > sending out the notices if they aren't the CRH? :) > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Keefe John <keefe...@ethoplex.com> wrote: > > This has been discussed before, the DMCA safe harbor doesn't allow the > provider to charge the copyright holder for this. > > On 2/2/2016 12:03 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > > > That's going to end up in a big mess of a lawsuit eventually. > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net> > wrote: > > > Haha! > > > > If it’s against your AUP, make sure you have a clause in there that says > you > charge per incident. > > > > Then go ahead and charge the customer. > > > > Sounds like if you are just going to kick them off eventually, might as > well > try to keep them, but make it costly. > > > > If they don’t pay it, then they are off. > > > > Nothing legally wrong with it if its in your policy I think. > > > > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf > Of That One Guy /sarcasm > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 10:57 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DMCA Time Management Fee > > > > Oh wow, youre seriously looking for a fight with customers > > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What do you thing about charging a fee every time that a customer gets a > DMCA takedown notice. These notices take time to track down and follow > up > on. If we charged $20 every time it would make it not really worth it to > pirate that $10 movie. I would think that it should be legal, so long as > we > add it to our customer agreement. Anyone ever thought about this? Right > now we pass on 5 of them and then make them find a new provider. It > seems > like they would be less likely to hit 5 if they had to pay $20 for each > one. > We really don't want these guys on our network anyway, so no sweat if > they > just cancel. Is anyone out there charging customers a fee for these? I > know most of you just ignore them, but we like passing them on, as it > lowers > our overall usage. > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > >
