Hey, they are great cables. Like you said, if you have the time and
experience Andrews is good stuff. But seriously, if you need some
connectors I have hundreds of them.

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016, 10:06 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hey Lewis....we did use a bunch of Huber Suhner cable assemblies and
> antennas when we created the MPAA 900....4 90 degree panels with combiner
> back in NCR WaveLAN days...we sold about 150 to a Columbian integrator for
> a bank project..  wish I could find pictures of it.  Anyways that was
> really nice cable.  Pricey but was worth it for some hush hush projects
> using Cylink products.
> On Feb 10, 2016 8:02 PM, "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ehh I don't know about that...
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> On Feb 10, 2016 9:50 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> But it probably costs Verizon $25...
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/10/2016 6:43 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>
>>> It's $250 new :P
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> On Feb 10, 2016 8:05 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are we still talking about a GPS cable for a $100 femtocell??!?
>>>>
>>>> bp
>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/10/2016 4:16 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dude, don't do that. LMR600. We buy it by the thousands of feet. It is
>>>> much easier to run, less prone to damage, and equivalent in loss per
>>>> frequency range.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016, 4:09 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Andrew 1/2  Heliax
>>>>> On Feb 10, 2016 2:33 PM, "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> That's most helpful!  Do you have any idea what kind of cable that
>>>>>> was?  I'm assuming anything that will handle 1600 MHz with minimal loss
>>>>>> will work?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Sam Kirsch <sam...@plexicomm.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I spoke to my field guy, he said they took an SMB <-> N
>>>>>>> Connector and ran LMR to the roof.  Hope that helps.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *-- Samuel Kirsch, Network Support Plexicomm - Internet Solutions |
>>>>>>> www.plexicomm.net <http://www.plexicomm.net> <http://www.plexicomm.net>*
>>>>>>> * Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 <1.866.759.4678%20x109> | Fax:
>>>>>>> 1.866.852.4688 <1.866.852.4688>*
>>>>>>> *Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713 <1.866.759.9713> |
>>>>>>> <sam...@plexicomm.net>sam...@plexicomm.net <sam...@plexicomm.net>
>>>>>>> <sam...@plexicomm.net>*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>>>>> From: "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com>
>>>>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>>>>> Sent: 2/9/2016 9:42:37 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's an SMB connector, but again I find it really had to believe
>>>>>>> that if you stick it outside until you get a good sync and power it down
>>>>>>> that it won't resync indoors, I've never tried inside of a nuclear 
>>>>>>> bunker,
>>>>>>> but in normal houses and offices with tile and metal roofs I've never 
>>>>>>> had
>>>>>>> one issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yeah. Something like that. All I recall is it was ~~ 1/4" or so in
>>>>>>>> diameter. Don't quote me on that. I am disavowing all knowledge.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/9/2016 6:37 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> MCM as in MMC? Like MMCX?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>> On Feb 9, 2016 9:34 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Verizon cell extender (made by Samsung) has a little connector
>>>>>>>>> (don't recall the type, but it's about the size of MCM or so). Put a 
>>>>>>>>> wire
>>>>>>>>> on the end of the coax, and you're there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/9/2016 10:33 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How did you get a GPS antenna from the roof to the SCS box?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:28 PM, samuel <sam...@plexicomm.net>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Verizon's Samsung SCS series 3G and 4G Network Extender is what I
>>>>>>>>>> was dealing with.  We had to run our own GPS antenna from the roof 
>>>>>>>>>> down to
>>>>>>>>>> the basement to get the damn thing to sync properly.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As an aside, I didn't realize the Low E windows were code now,
>>>>>>>>>> and this is a very newly renovated building.  Will keep that in mind!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -- Sam Kirsch, Network Tech Support
>>>>>>>>>> Plexicomm Internet Solutions
>>>>>>>>>> Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 <1.866.759.4678%20x109> | Fax:
>>>>>>>>>> 1.866.852.4688
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> sam...@plexicomm.net | Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>> From: "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: 02/09/16 10:39 AM
>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> cell booster or gps booster?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jaime Solorza
>>>>>>>>>> Wireless Systems Architect
>>>>>>>>>> 915-861-1390
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Sam Kirsch <sam...@plexicomm.net>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Pull out a GPS App on your phone and make sure you can actually
>>>>>>>>>>> read the satellites from behind the window (I used 'GPS Test' on 
>>>>>>>>>>> Android).
>>>>>>>>>>> We had to install one of these boosters and were troubleshooting 
>>>>>>>>>>> why the
>>>>>>>>>>> damn thing wasn't working when I noticed that my phone GPS receiver 
>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>> working in rooms where the windows were open and not working in 
>>>>>>>>>>> rooms where
>>>>>>>>>>> the windows were closed. Building management didn't even know they'd
>>>>>>>>>>> purchased the windows with RF film.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *-- Samuel Kirsch, Network Support Plexicomm - Internet
>>>>>>>>>>> Solutions | www.plexicomm.net <http://www.plexicomm.net>
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.plexicomm.net>*
>>>>>>>>>>> * Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 | Fax: 1.866.852.4688*
>>>>>>>>>>>   *Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713 |
>>>>>>>>>>> <sam...@plexicomm.net>sam...@plexicomm.net <sam...@plexicomm.net>
>>>>>>>>>>> <sam...@plexicomm.net>*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>>>>>>>>> From: "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: 2/9/2016 9:50:42 AM
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It might not be just a matter of getting the location. If they
>>>>>>>>>>> use the 1pps clock from GPS to calibrate an oscillator before they 
>>>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>>>>>> transmitting, then it would legitimately take 20-30 minutes.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Telrad BTS's are like that too. Pisses me off if I ever have to
>>>>>>>>>>> reset the power.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/9/2016 12:12 AM, Jason McKemie wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For whatever reason, the receivers that they use in some of
>>>>>>>>>>> these don't seem to be "modern" at all. They frequently take an 
>>>>>>>>>>> excessively
>>>>>>>>>>> long time to get a lock.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, February 8, 2016, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Modern GPS receivers work surprisingly well, if not very
>>>>>>>>>>>> accurately, from inside a single floor wood framed house... My 
>>>>>>>>>>>> oneplus one
>>>>>>>>>>>> will pick up 6 satellites while standing in a central hallway 15'+ 
>>>>>>>>>>>> from any
>>>>>>>>>>>> window. Should be accurate enough to get a location within 75'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> All bets are off if it is a concrete framed apartment building
>>>>>>>>>>>> or something like that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I still find it amazing that anything works at -162 RSL. Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>> to tiny channel size and very basic modulation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>  On Feb 8, 2016 6:46 PM, "Bill Prince" <
>>>>>>>>>>>> javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','part15...@gmail.com');> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Canopy NAT seems to break it with regularity. It might also
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fail if the GPS location that it reports is not within a 1/4 mile 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of where
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the customer address is.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also requires enough GPS (like near a window) to get a GPS
>>>>>>>>>>>>> lock.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/8/2016 3:34 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the typical reasons for these not to work?� From
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the user guide it appears to use IPSEC, so I assume anything that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> prevents
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a VPN?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> �
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Verizon support told the customer they needed a Class A
>>>>>>>>>>>>> address.� WTF?� Did they maybe mean it *can't* be a class
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A address?� Customer uses 10.x.x.x addresses internally, behind 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cisco ASA
>>>>>>>>>>>>> firewall (which I don't manage).
>>>>>>>>>>>>> �
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do see some udp/500 and udp/4500 packets, I think that means
>>>>>>>>>>>>> something is using UDP for IPSEC NAT traversal?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to