Awesome sauce. Thanks! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Feb 11, 2016 11:13 AM, "Sam Kirsch" <sam...@plexicomm.net> wrote:
> Looks like we used LMR400. > > > > *-- Samuel Kirsch, Network SupportPlexicomm - Internet Solutions | > www.plexicomm.net <http://www.plexicomm.net>* > *Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 <1.866.759.4678%20x109> | Fax: 1.866.852.4688 > <1.866.852.4688>* > *Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713 <1.866.759.9713> | sam...@plexicomm.net > <sam...@plexicomm.net>* > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > Sent: 2/10/2016 4:33:43 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender" > > > That's most helpful! Do you have any idea what kind of cable that was? > I'm assuming anything that will handle 1600 MHz with minimal loss will work? > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Sam Kirsch <sam...@plexicomm.net> wrote: > >> Yeah, I spoke to my field guy, he said they took an SMB <-> N Connector >> and ran LMR to the roof. Hope that helps. >> >> >> >> *-- Samuel Kirsch, Network SupportPlexicomm - Internet Solutions | >> www.plexicomm.net <http://www.plexicomm.net/>* >> *Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 <1.866.759.4678%20x109> | Fax: >> 1.866.852.4688 <1.866.852.4688>* >> *Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713 <1.866.759.9713> | >> sam...@plexicomm.net <sam...@plexicomm.net>* >> >> >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> >> To: af@afmug.com >> Sent: 2/9/2016 9:42:37 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender" >> >> >> It's an SMB connector, but again I find it really had to believe that if >> you stick it outside until you get a good sync and power it down that it >> won't resync indoors, I've never tried inside of a nuclear bunker, but in >> normal houses and offices with tile and metal roofs I've never had one >> issue. >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Yeah. Something like that. All I recall is it was ~~ 1/4" or so in >>> diameter. Don't quote me on that. I am disavowing all knowledge. >>> >>> bp >>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>> >>> >>> On 2/9/2016 6:37 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>> >>> MCM as in MMC? Like MMCX? >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> On Feb 9, 2016 9:34 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The Verizon cell extender (made by Samsung) has a little connector >>>> (don't recall the type, but it's about the size of MCM or so). Put a wire >>>> on the end of the coax, and you're there. >>>> >>>> bp >>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2/9/2016 10:33 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>> >>>> How did you get a GPS antenna from the roof to the SCS box? >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:28 PM, samuel <sam...@plexicomm.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Verizon's Samsung SCS series 3G and 4G Network Extender is what I was >>>>> dealing with. We had to run our own GPS antenna from the roof down to the >>>>> basement to get the damn thing to sync properly. >>>>> >>>>> As an aside, I didn't realize the Low E windows were code now, and >>>>> this is a very newly renovated building. Will keep that in mind! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- Sam Kirsch, Network Tech Support >>>>> Plexicomm Internet Solutions >>>>> Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 | Fax: 1.866.852.4688 >>>>> >>>>> <sam...@plexicomm.net>sam...@plexicomm.net | Emergency Support: >>>>> 1.866.759.9713 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: "Jaime Solorza" < <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>>>> To: "Animal Farm" < <af@afmug.com>af@afmug.com> >>>>> Date: 02/09/16 10:39 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender" >>>>> >>>>> cell booster or gps booster? >>>>> >>>>> Jaime Solorza >>>>> Wireless Systems Architect >>>>> 915-861-1390 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Sam Kirsch <sam...@plexicomm.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Pull out a GPS App on your phone and make sure you can actually read >>>>>> the satellites from behind the window (I used 'GPS Test' on Android). We >>>>>> had to install one of these boosters and were troubleshooting why the >>>>>> damn >>>>>> thing wasn't working when I noticed that my phone GPS receiver was >>>>>> working >>>>>> in rooms where the windows were open and not working in rooms where the >>>>>> windows were closed. Building management didn't even know they'd >>>>>> purchased >>>>>> the windows with RF film. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *-- Samuel Kirsch, Network SupportPlexicomm - Internet Solutions | >>>>>> <http://www.plexicomm.net/>http://www.plexicomm.net/ >>>>>> <http://www.plexicomm.net/>* >>>>>> *Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 | Fax: 1.866.852.4688* >>>>>> *Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713 | <sam...@plexicomm.net> >>>>>> <sam...@plexicomm.net>sam...@plexicomm.net <sam...@plexicomm.net>* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>>>> From: "Adam Moffett" < <dmmoff...@gmail.com>dmmoff...@gmail.com> >>>>>> To: <af@afmug.com>af@afmug.com >>>>>> Sent: 2/9/2016 9:50:42 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender" >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It might not be just a matter of getting the location. If they use >>>>>> the 1pps clock from GPS to calibrate an oscillator before they start >>>>>> transmitting, then it would legitimately take 20-30 minutes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Telrad BTS's are like that too. Pisses me off if I ever have to reset >>>>>> the power. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/9/2016 12:12 AM, Jason McKemie wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> For whatever reason, the receivers that they use in some of these >>>>>> don't seem to be "modern" at all. They frequently take an excessively >>>>>> long >>>>>> time to get a lock. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Monday, February 8, 2016, Eric Kuhnke < <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> >>>>>> eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Modern GPS receivers work surprisingly well, if not very accurately, >>>>>>> from inside a single floor wood framed house... My oneplus one will >>>>>>> pick up >>>>>>> 6 satellites while standing in a central hallway 15'+ from any window. >>>>>>> Should be accurate enough to get a location within 75'. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All bets are off if it is a concrete framed apartment building or >>>>>>> something like that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I still find it amazing that anything works at -162 RSL. Thanks to >>>>>>> tiny channel size and very basic modulation. >>>>>>> On Feb 8, 2016 6:46 PM, "Bill Prince" < >>>>>>> javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','part15...@gmail.com');> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Canopy NAT seems to break it with regularity. It might also fail >>>>>>>> if the GPS location that it reports is not within a 1/4 mile of where >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> customer address is. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also requires enough GPS (like near a window) to get a GPS lock. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> bp >>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2/8/2016 3:34 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What are the typical reasons for these not to work?� From the >>>>>>>> user guide it appears to use IPSEC, so I assume anything that prevents >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> VPN? >>>>>>>> � >>>>>>>> Verizon support told the customer they needed a Class A address.� >>>>>>>> WTF?� Did they maybe mean it *can't* be a class A address?� >>>>>>>> Customer uses 10.x.x.x addresses internally, behind Cisco ASA firewall >>>>>>>> (which I don't manage). >>>>>>>> � >>>>>>>> I do see some udp/500 and udp/4500 packets, I think that means >>>>>>>> something is using UDP for IPSEC NAT traversal? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
