There are similar wave optics for 10G transceivers.

So 10x 1G and 4x10G should work on the same system if the channels/colors are 
non-overlapping.

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 40G

It would be getting waves on someone else's long haul network.

10G is a slam dunk over 10x 1G. Just checking out the scene for 40G.


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP<http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]


<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
________________________________
From: "Sterling Jacobson" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 11:25:12 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 40G
Depends on the distance, is this for WAN over a mile or two?

QSFP+ modules and switches can be cheap, but I agree that long distance bonding 
of 4x10 SFP+ modules is cheaper.



From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:22 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 40G

i think is more cost effective to bond 4 10g?
Sent from Outlook Mobile<https://aka.ms/qtex0l>


On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 9:17 AM -0800, "Josh Reynolds" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Which means that 40Gb WAN kin is now a steal :)
On Feb 27, 2016 11:05 AM, "Gino Villarini" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
40g is for lan, wan has jumped to 100g
Sent from Outlook Mobile<https://aka.ms/qtex0l>


On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 8:37 AM -0800, "Mike Hammett" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
For those of you that have looked at 40G, what are your thoughts on the 
hardware available? I'm looking at primarily switching, though something that 
does VPLS, CE or similar features would be nice. Something with TRILL or a 
TRILL derivative would be nice too.

I'm not talking Juniper MX scale. Light on power is one of the biggest 
priorities.

It doesn't need to have a million ports, either. I do like the Nexus 9k that 
we've got, but in some areas, something with more functionality would be nice.

I'm perfectly aware that what I want feature wise may not be available cost 
wise.


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions<http://www.ics-il.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP<http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]


<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>

Reply via email to