Windstream. I assume it's running on the same DTN-X platform that their 100G is running on, which should do coherent 40G.
I know it will depend on what they're using and obviously how proud they are of it. I'm just here to talk about the switches on the ends and not what's in the middle. I can't make an informed decision without having both pieces and in due time I'll have the transport cost piece. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erich Kaiser" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:05:18 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 40G Mike, Whos long haul is it? It will depend on what they are using on their end. The cheapest solution is multi-10g waves. Erich Kaiser North Central Tower [email protected] Office: 630-621-4804 Cell: 630-777-9291 On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Mike Hammett < [email protected] > wrote: It would be getting waves on someone else's long haul network. 10G is a slam dunk over 10x 1G. Just checking out the scene for 40G. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP From: "Sterling Jacobson" < [email protected] > To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 11:25:12 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 40G Depends on the distance, is this for WAN over a mile or two? QSFP+ modules and switches can be cheap, but I agree that long distance bonding of 4x10 SFP+ modules is cheaper. From: Af [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:22 AM To: [email protected] ; [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 40G i think is more cost effective to bond 4 10g? Sent from Outlook Mobile On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 9:17 AM -0800, "Josh Reynolds" < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> Which means that 40Gb WAN kin is now a steal :) On Feb 27, 2016 11:05 AM, "Gino Villarini" < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> 40g is for lan, wan has jumped to 100g Sent from Outlook Mobile On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 8:37 AM -0800, "Mike Hammett" < [email protected] > wrote: <blockquote> For those of you that have looked at 40G, what are your thoughts on the hardware available? I'm looking at primarily switching, though something that does VPLS, CE or similar features would be nice. Something with TRILL or a TRILL derivative would be nice too. I'm not talking Juniper MX scale. Light on power is one of the biggest priorities. It doesn't need to have a million ports, either. I do like the Nexus 9k that we've got, but in some areas, something with more functionality would be nice. I'm perfectly aware that what I want feature wise may not be available cost wise. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>
