Nevermind, I missed the "short of buying a connectorized AP" part. Also, these are small in physical size, but not so much in beamwidth.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > AM-M-V5G-TI > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Gino Villarini <ginovi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> ebay is your friend >> >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Gino Villarini <ginovi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> blessed that you can use 40 mhz... >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Those only have 100mbps ethernet, correct? On a 40mhz channel they can >>>> do 180mbps+ aggregate which is why I've been using the Force110 for the >>>> little sites. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4/15/2016 11:04 AM, Gino Villarini wrote: >>>> >>>> If you dont need gps syc, just do a Epmp 1000 integrated... >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Josh Luthman < >>>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Force 180. It's more gain, very narrow azimuth (great for a CPE). >>>>> It's the same thing turned 90*. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Brian Sullivan < >>>>> <installe...@foxvalley.net>installe...@foxvalley.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I guess I fell asleep at the ePMP wheel, why would they EOL these? >>>>>> >>>>>> On 4/14/2016 5:30 PM, George Skorup wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We bought a bunch of integrated 5GHz radios and keep them in a safe >>>>>>> place for this very reason. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/14/2016 5:28 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does anyone have a suggestion for a small AP antenna? Previously >>>>>>>> with Ubnt we would do an NSM5. This would give us 45*. The use case >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> just to service a few homes around the corner from the trees. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The original integrated radios are 30* but they're EOLed >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
