Thanks for the input guys, they have a screaming deal running right now, so I thought I'd ask.
On Saturday, July 2, 2016, Peter Kranz <pkr...@unwiredltd.com> wrote: > Cogent is great as long as you have another peer to balance out “issues”. > They have a shitload of the internet as directly connected customers. > > > > -PK > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] *On Behalf Of *Mike > Hammett > *Sent:* Friday, July 01, 2016 6:44 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cogent > > > > Location does make a big difference. I would in no way use them for a > single upstream. For one, Cogent doesn't have the entire IPv6 Internet. > They are great in a mix, especially if you have a route management platform > or take only customer routes. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Jason McKemie" <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com');>> > *To: *af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > *Sent: *Friday, July 1, 2016 5:52:04 PM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] Cogent > > Does anyone have experience with Cogent as a primary upstream? Good, bad, > ugly? I assume the service location makes some difference as well. > > > > -Jason > > >
