OK, now starting to understand it.  I will need one of them thar internal power 
supplies to measure up etc...

From: Mathew Howard 
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2016 11:39 AM
To: af 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone using the new Mikrotik CCR with passive cooling?

Most of the CCR's (with the exception of the passively cooled models, which 
just have a barrel connector on the back) have an internal 24v power supply - I 
think what people are wanting is a box tat will fit in place of the power 
supply and give them DC terminals where the AC plug currently is. 


On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

  So the device is already DC powered and you need to have terminals rather 
than the barrel connectors.  Do I have a basic understanding?

  From: Joe Novak 
  Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2016 10:29 AM
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone using the new Mikrotik CCR with passive cooling?

  I'll try to snap some pictures on Tuesday when I'm back at the office. I 
really want some DC terminals on my cloud cores.

  On Jul 3, 2016 8:57 AM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

    Still not totally sure what that photo of the PCB means.  

    From: Erich Kaiser 
    Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2016 8:18 PM
    To: af@afmug.com 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone using the new Mikrotik CCR with passive cooling?

    Most of the CCRs have 1 PSU, but two header power connectors, if you look 
at Faisal's links you can see what we mean.  It really would be a simple 
product to produce.  low input cost, probably could sell for $25/piece.  It 
should have screw terminals labeled with input voltage allowed and pos /neg.  
You could even put in some type of fused /surge protected solution if you 
wanted to get creative :) 


    Erich Kaiser 
    North Central Tower
    er...@northcentraltower.com
    Office: 630-621-4804
    Cell: 630-777-9291


    On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

      I have not really been following this thread.  Give me some reference 
links so I can understand what it  is you need.  

      From: Erich Kaiser 
      Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2016 5:25 PM
      To: af@afmug.com 
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone using the new Mikrotik CCR with passive 
cooling?

      Would be nice if they made a module that would fit into existing AC Plug 
hole it could have the primary and secondary terminals on it.  Chuck? 


      Erich Kaiser 
      North Central Tower
      er...@northcentraltower.com
      Office: 630-621-4804
      Cell: 630-777-9291


      On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net> 
wrote:

        FYI... 

        http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=69422

        
http://shop.meconet.de/Hardware-component-parts/Accessories/DC-power-cable-for-MikroTik-CCR-CRS-25cm::116243.html?language=en

        :)



        Faisal Imtiaz
        Snappy Internet & Telecom
        7266 SW 48 Street
        Miami, FL 33155
        Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

        Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net


------------------------------------------------------------------------

          From: "David Milholen" <dmilho...@wletc.com>
          To: af@afmug.com
          Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 6:04:10 PM
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone using the new Mikrotik CCR with passive 
cooling?

          I am not a large WIsp but with 20 sites and more being added each 
year where I have a Mikrotik at every site plus additional Mikrotik switches to 
go at the larger sites.

          Maybe a small drop in the bucket but hey even if they had a module 
that would replace the power supply with terminals I would buy enough for all 
my sites and extra for new ones.

          I am sure Someone (Chuck) could figure it out. Even if it were only 
for a few Rack mount series.

          All of our sites have some sort of DC backup no UPS. This includes 
the few we have with generators.





          On 6/30/2016 9:24 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:

            Maybe not so much in the USA, where electricity is plentiful, but 
Mikrotik is wildly popular in places like Nepal and developing nations in 
Africa. The line between WISP and ISP is blurry when a place never had 
terrestrial/wireline infrastructure of any sort to begin with.


            On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Josh Reynolds 
<j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:

              Not many. To be fair, "remote deployments" are a tiny subset of 
WISPs, which is a tiny subset of ISPs, which is a subset of "people who deploy 
mikrotik".

              On Jun 30, 2016 9:18 PM, "David Milholen" <dmilho...@wletc.com> 
wrote:

                WHOOPIE POE BIG DEAL!

                [I want my MTV...] External Power lugs Come On Mikrotik ... 


                How many of us use these at remote sites and have direct DC 
connect for power

                Makes for efficient and less heat when doing UPS deployments.





                On 6/30/2016 9:08 PM, can...@believewireless.net wrote:

                  You can also power them off a standard PoE switch which is 
cool.

                  On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Josh Reynolds 
<j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:

                    I actually just deployed 2 today as 1Gbps active demarcs.

                    The dual power supply version went in at a different place 
last week.


                    On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Eric Kuhnke 
<eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote:
                    > I could see this being quite useful for small off-grid 
solar sites, such as
                    > a hilltop used as an intermediate PTP relay that also has 
a few sectors...
                    >
                    > $425 for the version without SFP+, $495 for the one with 
SFP+
                    >
                    > http://routerboard.com/CCR1009-8G-1S-1SplusPC
                    >
                    > 
http://i.mt.lv/routerboard/files/CCR1009-8G-1S-1SplusPC-151223131816.pdf
                    >
                    >




                -- 





          -- 





Reply via email to