When it comes to wall penetration 3.5 is not very good. Carriers here have 1800 and 2500 for smaller cells.
Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Mike Hammett Gesendet: Montag, 3. Oktober 2016 14:16 An: af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? Indoor, they'll use 3.5. ----- Mike Hammett <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> _____ From: "Stefan Englhardt" < <mailto:s...@genias.net> s...@genias.net> To: <mailto:af@afmug.com> af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 7:05:16 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? As 3.5 GHz isn’t that good with indoor coverage I guess cellulars first fill up the spectrum below 3GHz and migrate from UMTS/GPRS/GSM to LTE to squeeze more bandwidth out of the lower frequencies. Indoor they might use wifi. Vodaphone and T-Mobile e.g. do wifi-calling with some handsets. Von: Af [ <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Josh Reynolds Gesendet: Montag, 3. Oktober 2016 13:04 An: <mailto:af@afmug.com> af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? 3.xx is in the sights of AT&T, Verizon, Google, etc as well. On Oct 3, 2016 5:37 AM, "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net <mailto:s...@genias.net> > wrote: At the moment there are the following options: TDD LTE (Baicells / Telrad / Huawei) PMP450 (Cambium) WiMAX (Cambium/Purewave/Telrad) UBNT M365 (Ubiquity) WiMAX and UBNT do not have any development/future. TDD-LTE claims good NLOS capabilities. PMP450 claims higher sector capacity with LOS (QAM256). LTE claims Standards compatibility while there are not much options to select between. Baicell seem to bring LTE costs down to the Level of PMP450 while both are way above the level of wifi-based 5GHz systems. Baicell is in a testing/beta stage phase. PMP450 may increase performance/NLOS capability with cnMedusa next year. Not seen any announcements where TDD-LTE implementations are heading to next year. We’re still running WiMAX for NLOS as there is no clear path where to go
