Definitely looking at Fixed as a solution. They wanna drink the Fixed
Koolaid too but chance favors the prepared mind :)
On 10/03/2016 07:47 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
It might be different in Europe (deployments, not physics). Here one
carrier owns nearly all of 2.5. All share the rest of the bands. The
US carriers have only talked about 3.5 from the small cells aspect.
Maybe outdoor urban, but definitely high density venues.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net>
*To: *af@afmug.com
*Sent: *Monday, October 3, 2016 7:43:50 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?
When it comes to wall penetration 3.5 is not very good. Carriers here
have 1800 and 2500 for smaller cells.
*Von:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Mike Hammett
*Gesendet:* Montag, 3. Oktober 2016 14:16
*An:* af@afmug.com
*Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?
Indoor, they'll use 3.5.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net <mailto:s...@genias.net>>
*To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Monday, October 3, 2016 7:05:16 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?
As 3.5 GHz isn’t that good with indoor coverage I guess cellulars
first fill up the spectrum below 3GHz and migrate from UMTS/GPRS/GSM
to LTE to squeeze more bandwidth out of the lower frequencies. Indoor
they might use wifi. Vodaphone and T-Mobile e.g. do wifi-calling with
some handsets.
*Von:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Josh Reynolds
*Gesendet:* Montag, 3. Oktober 2016 13:04
*An:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?
3.xx is in the sights of AT&T, Verizon, Google, etc as well.
On Oct 3, 2016 5:37 AM, "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net
<mailto:s...@genias.net>> wrote:
At the moment there are the following options:
TDD LTE (Baicells / Telrad / Huawei)
PMP450 (Cambium)
WiMAX (Cambium/Purewave/Telrad)
UBNT M365 (Ubiquity)
WiMAX and UBNT do not have any development/future. TDD-LTE claims
good NLOS capabilities. PMP450 claims higher sector capacity with
LOS (QAM256). LTE claims Standards compatibility while there are
not much options to select between. Baicell seem to bring LTE
costs down to the Level of PMP450 while both are way above the
level of wifi-based 5GHz systems. Baicell is in a testing/beta
stage phase. PMP450 may increase performance/NLOS capability with
cnMedusa next year. Not seen any announcements where TDD-LTE
implementations are heading to next year.
We’re still running WiMAX for NLOS as there is no clear path where
to go
--
