Why no use a 900 ap and sm? Gino A. Villarini @gvillarini
Gino Villarini President Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 [cid:aeronet-logo_310cfc3e-6691-4f69-bd49-b37b834b9238.png] On Oct 27, 2016, at 6:21 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net<mailto:jon-ispli...@michwave.net>> wrote: Yeah. I never tried it before. It's not an awesome idea. But if the customer pays $1500 for the install, we thought we would try a PTP in their direction. 900MHz :-) Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:35 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> wrote: Yeah....I'm curious who/what led you to believe otherwise. Did Cambium sales or support ever say that a PTP could sync with a PMP? On 10/27/2016 4:23 PM, George Skorup wrote: The other problem since the beginning of time with Canopy style PTPs is that the master starts up in beaconing mode with a max range of like 120 miles and waits for a BHS reg attempt then does auto-ranging and shifts the timing. So yeah, it's pretty much impossible. On 10/27/2016 3:18 PM, Sean Heskett wrote: that's been true since the beginning of time. you can get it close with 50% downlink on the AP and then use the frame calculator to match the air delay parameter to the BHS. not easy at all but you could probably get it to work. your best bet is to use different bands for PMP and PTP tho. -Sean On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net<mailto:jon-ispli...@michwave.net>> wrote: I don't think their support department understands the concept of sync. But as of now we have given up on PTP products syncing 100% with PMP products. Oh well Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc.
