We do. Just thought I would try PTP in a small instance Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> On Oct 28, 2016, at 6:44 AM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote: > > Why no use a 900 ap and sm? > > Gino A. Villarini > @gvillarini > > > > > > Gino Villarini > > President > Metro Office Park #18 Suite 304 Guaynabo, Puerto Rico 00968 > <aeronet-logo_310cfc3e-6691-4f69-bd49-b37b834b9238.png> > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 6:21 PM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> wrote: > >> Yeah. I never tried it before. It's not an awesome idea. But if the customer >> pays $1500 for the install, we thought we would try a PTP in their >> direction. 900MHz :-) >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> >> On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:35 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Yeah....I'm curious who/what led you to believe otherwise. >>> >>> Did Cambium sales or support ever say that a PTP could sync with a PMP? >>> >>>> On 10/27/2016 4:23 PM, George Skorup wrote: >>>> The other problem since the beginning of time with Canopy style PTPs is >>>> that the master starts up in beaconing mode with a max range of like 120 >>>> miles and waits for a BHS reg attempt then does auto-ranging and shifts >>>> the timing. So yeah, it's pretty much impossible. >>>> >>>>> On 10/27/2016 3:18 PM, Sean Heskett wrote: >>>>> that's been true since the beginning of time. >>>>> >>>>> you can get it close with 50% downlink on the AP and then use the frame >>>>> calculator to match the air delay parameter to the BHS. not easy at all >>>>> but you could probably get it to work. >>>>> >>>>> your best bet is to use different bands for PMP and PTP tho. >>>>> >>>>> -Sean >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Jon Langeler >>>>>> <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> wrote: >>>>>> I don't think their support department understands the concept of sync. >>>>>> But as of now we have given up on PTP products syncing 100% with PMP >>>>>> products. Oh well >>>>>> >>>>>> Jon Langeler >>>>>> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
