I think so...
-----Original Message-----
From: Nate Burke
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:29 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
So if you were to use like a v/h UBNT antenna instead of the Dual Slant
antenna, They both should work? Wondering what the 3x price difference
between antennas gains you.
On 11/22/2016 4:26 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
Supposedly it makes up for the loss by using the desired signal
component from both antennas.
I remember reading the original white paper, and I remember thinking I
understood it for about 5 minutes or so.
-----Original Message----- From: Nate Burke
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:24 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
So you have a Dual slant AP and a V/H SM? Isn't that just losing signal
for no reason?
On 11/22/2016 4:21 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
They've apparently got some electronic magic that can take the
received signal on V/H and calculate what the transmitted dual slant
signal was. It's been explained here, but I don't remember the
details. They assert that you can mix and match safely. In fact
they started out selling slant pol sector antennas and V+H SM's, so
they are/were confident enough in this to make it the "default" setup.
It's a feature of their 802.11n chipset, so the computation is done
in hardware.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Nate Burke" <n...@blastcomm.com>
To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: 11/22/2016 5:14:04 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 antenna C024900D004A, and it lists it
as being DualSlant +/-45 degrees. Does this mean that the Force 200
2.4 radios are also Dual Slant to talk to this antenna? I didn't
find anything on the Force200 spec sheet talking about slant. If
you use a V/H Antenna as the AP, can you not use the Force 200 as
the SM?
