So how does the connector distinguish between these antennas and relay
information to chip set to "phase differently"? I am assuming these
antennas are passive with no smarts.

On Nov 22, 2016 3:42 PM, "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:

Phase. Yes, it's built into the chipset. 450 does it too. At least the 3.65.


On 11/22/2016 4:34 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:

> I think so...
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Nate Burke Sent: Tuesday, November 22,
> 2016 3:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna
> options
> So if you were to use like a v/h UBNT antenna instead of the Dual Slant
> antenna, They both should work?  Wondering what the 3x price difference
> between antennas gains you.
>
> On 11/22/2016 4:26 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>
>> Supposedly it makes up for the loss by using the desired signal component
>> from both antennas.
>> I remember reading the original white paper, and I remember thinking I
>> understood it for about 5 minutes or so.
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Nate Burke
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:24 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
>>
>> So you have a Dual slant AP and a V/H SM?  Isn't that just losing signal
>> for no reason?
>>
>> On 11/22/2016 4:21 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>>
>>> They've apparently got some electronic magic that can take the received
>>> signal on V/H and calculate what the transmitted dual slant signal was.
>>> It's been explained here, but I don't remember the details.  They assert
>>> that you can mix and match safely.  In fact they started out selling slant
>>> pol sector antennas and V+H SM's, so they are/were confident enough in this
>>> to make it the "default" setup.
>>>
>>> It's a feature of their 802.11n chipset, so the computation is done in
>>> hardware.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>> From: "Nate Burke" <n...@blastcomm.com>
>>> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com>
>>> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:14:04 PM
>>> Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
>>>
>>> I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 antenna C024900D004A, and it lists it as
>>>> being DualSlant +/-45 degrees. Does this mean that the Force 200 2.4 radios
>>>> are also Dual Slant to talk to this antenna?  I didn't find anything on the
>>>> Force200 spec sheet talking about slant.  If you use a V/H Antenna as the
>>>> AP, can you not use the Force 200 as the SM?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>

Reply via email to