We currently have our Cambium subscribers do all of the package QOS
assignments to allow for a burst/stream config.
My issue is I am not sure the best way to distribute access to each user
except via a layer2 bridge with some vlans for better segmentation.
We do route everything but when it comes to consolidation at the edge
for the customer its nothing more than a bridge. I have heard that ppoe
would be a better option to take. I am not sure of this due to all the
concentrators that may be needed and issues with that as well.
We simply do layer 2 and use the horizon isolation for each port and
vlans where needed and tell the APs to block all subscriber destined
upstream chatter.
Video is becoming more and more an issue with any wireless network.
On 11/23/2016 12:44 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Are you are just looking to shape general traffic to a client (like
give someone a 1.5Mbps plan) then you could use Mikrotik and simple
queues which is very in-expensive. If you want to do some shaping on
an application like only streaming or Windows Updates and stuff like
that then that's where things start to get expensive. I am using the
Procera myself for that and although I havn't tried any of the other
brands you mention I am very happy with the Procera.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Wireless Administrator
<wirel...@htn.net <mailto:wirel...@htn.net>> wrote:
We’re in the market for a traffic shaping appliance and have had a
look at Procera so far. I have a list of vendors/products a have
assembled over time that I was going to look into:
Saisei
NetEqualizer
/Packeteer (Bluecoat)/
/NetEnforcer (Allot)/
/Network Composer (Cymphonix)/
/Exinda/
//
/Anyone care to share experiences on this subject?/
//
/Steve B./
--
