Brandon, Yes I had a tower that was EPMP 2.4 before I converter it to 450 and the 450 is running much better. The ePMP really only worked in LOS and very limited would work on some NLOS links. I even had trouble with the EPMP on some LOS links.
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Brandon Yuchasz <li...@gogebicrange.net> wrote: > Kurt, > > Have you tested the ePMP 2.4 as well? > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Kurt Fankhauser > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:57 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > > > 2.4ghz PMP450 penetrates better than UBNT 2.4. Don't know if its the slant > polarization helping or what. > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:47 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < > par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: > > > > Still the issue of 2.4 EPMP does not seem to penetrate as well as UBNT - > at least from my field guys. > > I know there was some serious discussion on this once upon a time. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:16 PM > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > > > I want to know the throughput comparisons? EPMP vs UBNT now? > > Jon Langeler > > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > > > > > On Nov 30, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's not a bad deal at all. We have several towers where we put up both > UBNT and ePMP 5ghz APs, with the intention of eventually replacing all the > UBNT CPE with ePMP and shutting down the old AP - this is going to save us > a ton of time and money. > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:40 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 35 bucks a pop to extend a depreciated hardware is not a bad deal at all > > > > they just said if you have a failed AP, theyll honor system your licenses > to an existing AP you have so you dont have to wait on RMA > > > > Im beginning to wonder about Cambium, theyre building EPMP into a really > hot product that is good enough to compete with the 450 in the margin > markets > > > > Is this the same Cambium that bought moto, or has there been a > restructuring? Because originally, they were bigger cocks than moto > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Jason Wilson <ja...@remotelylocated.com> > wrote: > > Mikrotik? > > > > On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by > shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, this > might give us a better window > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is compatible > with an Intel Core isn't it? > > > > Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > > From: "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net> > > To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > > Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > > > They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the > oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. > > > > > > *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 > *An:* af@afmug.com > *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! > > > > you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace and > some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt managers > here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I > signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote: > > I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www. > cambiumnetworks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ > > > > Very interesting indeed... very interesting. > > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat <tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com> > wrote: > > This ought to shake things up a bit. > > > > http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ > > > > <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> > > / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> > > www.businesswire.com > > / > > > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > >
