I want to know the throughput comparisons? EPMP vs UBNT now?

Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.


> On Nov 30, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> It's not a bad deal at all. We have several towers where we put up both UBNT 
> and ePMP 5ghz APs, with the intention of eventually replacing all the UBNT 
> CPE with ePMP and shutting down the old AP - this is going to save us a ton 
> of time and money.
> 
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:40 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm 
>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 35 bucks a pop to extend a depreciated hardware is not a bad deal at all
>> 
>> they just said if you have a failed AP, theyll honor system your licenses to 
>> an existing AP you have so you dont have to wait on RMA
>> 
>> Im beginning to wonder about Cambium, theyre building EPMP into a really hot 
>> product that is good enough to compete with the 450 in the margin markets
>> 
>> Is this the same Cambium that bought moto, or has there been a 
>> restructuring? Because originally, they were bigger cocks than moto
>> 
>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Jason Wilson <ja...@remotelylocated.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> Mikrotik?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" 
>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by 
>>>> shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, 
>>>> this might give us a better window
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Compatible doesn't mean "same".  Software for an Intel 386 is compatible 
>>>>> with an Intel Core isn't it?  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>>> From: "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net>
>>>>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
>>>>> Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium!
>>>>> 
>>>>>> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the 
>>>>>> oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same 
>>>>>> SW.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von That One Guy 
>>>>>> /sarcasm
>>>>>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12
>>>>>> An: af@afmug.com
>>>>>> Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace  and 
>>>>>> some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt managers 
>>>>>> here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm 
>>>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I 
>>>>>> signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I prefer the Cambium direct link: 
>>>>>> http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Very interesting indeed... very interesting. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat 
>>>>>> <tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This ought to shake things up a bit.  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> /
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> www.businesswire.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> /
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team 
>>>>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team 
>>>>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team 
>>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
>> part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
> 

Reply via email to