Rocket GPS or Rocket Ti? I never had GPS problems with Ti. I did have other problems, but not GPS ones.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:47:42 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! If they can do 2.5ms frame duration and allow us to fine tune tx/rx start/stop, then I'm sure it would be possible to sync with other stuff. ePMP on the other hand still needs some of the same knobs. It doesn't exactly sync with the 450. Plus you can't do 2.5ms on 10MHz channel width. And I still want to see 30MHz channel width support. ePMP Elevate software on GPS Rockets is almost pointless. The few GPS Rockets we deployed sucked balls. They would constantly lose GPS lock for days at a time. Rebooting or power-cycling didn't help. Plus no sync over power. So I'd rather just deploy ePMP hardware for the AP/BH anyway. We don't have much UBNT PTMP left except for the M365 shit which we're still ripping out left and right. But for an operator with lots of deployed M CPEs, Elevate makes sense for a fast conversion. On 11/30/2016 1:45 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote: Real-deal sync! The real trick will be them syncing with 450's! :-0 On 11/30/2016 1:35 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: <blockquote> ptp sync and ptmp sync are two totally different animals On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Kurt Fankhauser < lists.wavel...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> its not out yet so we will see, but I would assume it works flawless once it gets here because it works fine on airfiber PTP and its based on the same platform On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:24 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> does the airfiber ptmp have functional sync that actually syncs, or just sync like titanium had sync? On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Kurt Fankhauser < lists.wavel...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> Hopefulyl UBNT will step up their game now, its crucial to keeping prices low that there is strong competition among venders. I am hoping the Airfiber PTMP comes out soon so that this will beat Cambium back on price with the 450 line which is sucking my wallet dry everyday. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:15 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> the jist of it is like when Jesus turned water into wine, only now jesus is cambium, but he wants 35 bucks for the wine On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Justin Wilson < li...@mtin.net > wrote: <blockquote> http://www.mtin.net/blog/?p=1442 Some Cliff Notes Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net --- http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric <blockquote> On Nov 30, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Dennis Burgess < dmburg...@linktechs.net > wrote: Someone want to write up the entire thing? What it is etc? how it works vs having us all listen to a webinar :? Dennis Burgess – Network Solution Engineer – Consultant MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant – MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com Office: 314-735-0270 E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Steve D Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:28 AM To: af < af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! What, you mean they didn't just change the 5's to 3's in the GUI? Learn something new everyday. :p -Steve D On Nov 30, 2016 8:41 AM, "Bill Prince" < part15...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> There are probably hardware filters on the RF side. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 11/30/2016 8:35 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: <blockquote> so I have a technical question. The m365 gear is ssupposed to be downconverted 5ghz, is that a software downconvert? (FCC ID issues aside) If thats the case could this be loaded onto m365 to turn it into epmp 5ghz? I assume the downconvert is more than a software load, but man, I literally would make a very inappropriate mess if I could dump the ubnt 3ghz network into epmp in one move On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Adam Moffett < dmmoff...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> 25% is what I remember. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Josh Reynolds" < j...@kyneticwifi.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: 11/30/2016 11:29:32 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! <blockquote> That's a very interesting point. I don't think their margins are that low though. They've done what, 40mil units sold? I think that was the last number I heard. On Nov 30, 2016 10:27 AM, "Kurt Fankhauser" < lists.wavel...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> If Ubiquitis margins were low then Cambium could very well end up making more money on a radio that Ubiquiti engineered, manufactures, and delivered. Lol On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> This is capitalism in its finest form. Cambium just upped the bar substantially. The market had a very serious issue, and they solved it, while still generating substantial revenue. Im curious what their profit per hardware unit sold is compared to the profit per license, with no real liability. Hopefully this will force ubnt to really focus efforts on real sync that actually works and get an actual legitimate support channel. Or even better, sell their radios preloaded with the EPMP load and work out a discount for AP licenses through them for their customers. Mikrotik I assume is just saying "meh, our products are good" On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Kurt Fankhauser < lists.wavel...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> This is pretty neat with the whole Mikrotik thing, basically you can run a Mikrotik CPE network and be GPS synchronized then... On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jason Wilson < ja...@remotelylocated.com > wrote: <blockquote> ePMP Elevate Compatibility check the Release Notes for complete details * Loco M5 XW * Loco M5 XM * NanoStation M5 XW * NanoStation M5 XM * NanoBridge M5 XM * Rocket M5 XM * Rocket M5 XW * Powerbeam M5 XW * Airgrid M5HP XW * Airgrid M5 XM * NanoBeam M5 XW ePMP Elevate Developments RELEASE 1.0 - NOW AVAILABLE * XM + XW model * Rocket M5 support as a SM - Dec 28, 2016 RELEASE 2.0 - END OF Q1 2017 * MikroTik Support - Alpha engagement in Q4, 2016 * RB911G5HPnDQRT * RBSXT5nDr2 * RB912UAG5HPnDOT 2.4 XW + XM MODELS - END OF Q1, 2017 DELIBERANT SUPPORT - Q2, 2017 Jason Wilson Remotely Located Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. 530-651-1736 530-748-9608 Cell www.remotelylocated.com On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Stefan Englhardt < s...@genias.net > wrote: <blockquote> Does this work for 11ac Mikrotiks ;-)) Von: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] Im Auftrag von Jason Wilson Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:03 An: af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! I tuned in to the last half of the webinar, Mikrotik is down the road, BUT is in the works. From a 100% Mikrotik network that is a time/cash saver. Jason Wilson Remotely Located Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places. 530-651-1736 530-748-9608 Cell www.remotelylocated.com On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Jason Wilson < ja...@remotelylocated.com > wrote: <blockquote> Mikrotik? On Nov 30, 2016 7:31 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> we have been installing epmp SMs to ubnt backhauls on small sites by shutting off airmax until we get a chance to get EPMP APs at the site, this might give us a better window On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Adam Moffett < dmmoff...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> Compatible doesn't mean "same". Software for an Intel 386 is compatible with an Intel Core isn't it? Point taken though...ePMP is still 802.11n. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Stefan Englhardt" < s...@genias.net > To: " af@afmug.com " < af@afmug.com > Sent: 11/30/2016 10:25:23 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! <blockquote> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. Von: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] Im Auftrag von That One Guy /sarcasm Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 An: af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace and some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt managers here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak < jno...@lrcomm.com > wrote: <blockquote> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ Very interesting indeed... very interesting. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat < tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com > wrote: <blockquote> This ought to shake things up a bit. http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ / www.businesswire.com / </blockquote> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. </blockquote> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. </blockquote> </blockquote> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. </blockquote> </blockquote> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. </blockquote> </blockquote> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. </blockquote> </blockquote>
