You using some kind of voice-to-text thing there Lewis? (And were you eating several marbles while saying that last one?)
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 2:09 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 450 can signal be too hot? Dammit On Tue, Dec 20, 2016, 2:08 PM Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com<mailto:lewis.berg...@gmail.com>> wrote: I dobby know where I got it but I Jane always used. -45. Maybe that comes from running BER on a P25 radio at 9600 baud. On Tue, Dec 20, 2016, 1:55 PM Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote: I am sure you can get to the point where the receive amp or mixer runs out of head room, but I would think it would be much hotter than –55 dBm. From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 12:52 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] Cambium 450 can signal be too hot? I know there is ATPC to limit the rcv power at the AP, but what about at the SM? Has anyone heard of a max acceptable rcv signal? Would -55 be too hot? (With FSK we got used to the idea the signal could never be too hot, because what mattered was the zero crossings.)
