Hi Sean, since the 15.0.2.1 firmware release, have you had a chance to hang the 450m yet? If so, how is it performing?
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: > Hi Gang, > > sorry I'm late to the conversation. > > We have successfully provided sync over power to our 450m's using: > 1. Packetflux gigabit sync injector. > 2. Lastmile gear CTM2 (power option G - you need the latest firmware) > > We have successfully provided sync over timing port to our 450m's using: > 1. Cambium uGPS > 2. Packetflux sync box 12 (rev I0) > > > Hope that helps! > > -Sean > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Traveling Diner <ccie4...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> So we had two of three 450Ms walk in the door today. And we haven't >> bought power or GPS for them yet waiting to see what was going to happen >> with either CMM5 or PFlux support for them. Which now puts us at an awsh*t >> point because we'd really like to get these up on a tower. Could someone >> (Forrest, Sean, et al.) please weigh in authoritatively on whether we can >> safely do this with PFlux or if we need to order the standalone power and >> UGPS in the interim? >> >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 6:41 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: >> >>> I'm confused because the official position is that the 450m uses >>> "Cambium Sync" (whatever the hell that is). But Sean said he has a 450m >>> receiving sync over power (aka Canopy Sync) from a GigE PowerInjector+Sync >>> I believe. Apparently the hardware does support it. >>> >>> >>> On 12/14/2016 5:05 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote: >>> >>>> Other than supporting Sync over power for Medusa, what else does the >>>> new CMM5 give you over the competition? >>>> >>>> http://www.doubleradius.com/Manufacturers/Accessories_34/ >>>> >>>> Is Sync over power for 450m on the Packetflux roadmap? >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- -- *Sam Lambie* Taosnet Wireless Tech. 575-758-7598 Office www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com>
