So if the gigabit syncinjector can power the 450M (but won't supply sync), does
that mean I can use a 4 channel Gigabit POE injector for power, and use a
SyncBox Junior for sync?
-bp
On Thursday, February 2, 2017 3:44 PM, Sam Lambie <samtaos...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Sean, since the 15.0.2.1 firmware release, have you had a chance to hang
the 450m yet? If so, how is it performing?
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote:
Hi Gang,
sorry I'm late to the conversation.
We have successfully provided sync over power to our 450m's using:1.
Packetflux gigabit sync injector.2. Lastmile gear CTM2 (power option G - you
need the latest firmware)
We have successfully provided sync over timing port to our 450m's using:1.
Cambium uGPS2. Packetflux sync box 12 (rev I0)
Hope that helps!
-Sean
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Traveling Diner <ccie4...@gmail.com> wrote:
So we had two of three 450Ms walk in the door today. And we haven't bought
power or GPS for them yet waiting to see what was going to happen with either
CMM5 or PFlux support for them. Which now puts us at an awsh*t point because
we'd really like to get these up on a tower. Could someone (Forrest, Sean, et
al.) please weigh in authoritatively on whether we can safely do this with
PFlux or if we need to order the standalone power and UGPS in the interim?
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 6:41 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
I'm confused because the official position is that the 450m uses "Cambium Sync"
(whatever the hell that is). But Sean said he has a 450m receiving sync over
power (aka Canopy Sync) from a GigE PowerInjector+Sync I believe. Apparently
the hardware does support it.
On 12/14/2016 5:05 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote:
Other than supporting Sync over power for Medusa, what else does the new CMM5
give you over the competition?
http://www.doubleradius.com/Ma nufacturers/Accessories_34/
Is Sync over power for 450m on the Packetflux roadmap?
--
--
Sam Lambie
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598 Office
www.Taosnet.com
