Yeah, I really don't trust them that much either, but they're certainly
useful for getting an idea of how different areas compare. Things will
certainly work differently in Utah than they do for us in southern
Wisconsin/northern Illinois.

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

> Assuming you trust the models.
>
> I for one, don't.
>
> https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp/posts/
> 956205354504917?match=cmFpbg%3D%3D
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> ------------------------------
> *From: *"Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com>
> *To: *"af" <af@afmug.com>
> *Sent: *Thursday, February 9, 2017 9:29:53 AM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 11GHz and 18GHz real throughput
>
> It may not be a rain forest, but it's not a desert either... there's going
> to be a big difference between rainzones K and B. According to Mimosa's
> design tool, the Rain Fade in Utah would only be around 17db, which should
> make 15 miles easily doable at 11ghz.
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>
>> At 15 miles in 11 GHz I get 40+ dB rain fade.  Only acceptable with 5 or
>> 6 GHz backup.  I wouldn't even think about trying 18 GHz at that distance.
>> And this is northern Illinois, not a rain forest.
>>
>> Oh, and you can deny climate change all you want, but in many places the
>> rain models are optimistic.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Trey Scarborough
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 9:33 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 11GHz and 18GHz real throughput
>>
>> I have a 18ghz 15mile link with no issues. and 4' dishes. It was the only
>> thing I could get 80mhz channels in.
>>
>> shouldn't be a problem with 11ghz at all just depends on the equipment
>> used. It also depends on your definition of huge... For some its 3" for
>> others it is 8'. completely acceptable for most rain regions with 4' dishes.
>>
>> On 2/8/2017 7:54 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>> > http://media.cmgdigital.com/shared/lt/lt_cache/thumbnail/610/img/photo
>> > s/2017/02/08/94/08/sex-offender-sought.jpg
>> >
>> > I've seen this too, doesn't mean I'd recommend anyone do it.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----
>> > Mike Hammett
>> > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentC
>> > omputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-
>> > computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/m
>> > idwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>> >
>> >
>> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > --
>> > *From: *"Jeremy" <jeremysmi...@gmail.com>
>> > *To: *af@afmug.com
>> > *Sent: *Wednesday, February 8, 2017 7:51:51 PM
>> > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 11GHz and 18GHz real throughput
>> >
>> > I have seen an 18GHz link that far with 6' dishes.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net
>> > <mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Not a chance at 18. Maybe 11, but that's even far for 11 GHz without
>> >     huge dishes.
>> >
>> >     Play with Mimosa's designer, Cambium's LinkPlanner, etc.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >     -----
>> >     Mike Hammett
>> >     Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>> >     <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+
>> IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.
>> com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>> >     Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>> >     <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.
>> linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://
>> twitter.com/mdwestix>
>> >     The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>> >     <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>> >
>> >
>> >     <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> >     -----------------------------------------------------------
>> -------------
>> >     *From: *"Brett A Mansfield" <li...@silverlakeinternet.com
>> >     <mailto:li...@silverlakeinternet.com>>
>> >     *To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
>> >     *Sent: *Wednesday, February 8, 2017 7:38:58 PM
>> >     *Subject: *[AFMUG] 11GHz and 18GHz real throughput
>> >
>> >     Hi,
>> >
>> >     I've never yet done a licensed link and there is plenty of these two
>> >     frequencies available in my area. I need to be able to get 500Mbps
>> >     at about 15 miles. Is that possible with either of these?
>> >
>> >     What kind of real world speeds can I expect out of these and what
>> >     channel size do I need to license to get those speeds?
>> >
>> >     Is there something else I should consider? What brand/model radios
>> >     and dishes, what other frequencies for easier licensing, etc?
>> >
>> >     It would be great to be able to get a gig that distance, but I'm
>> >     trying to be realistic and get just what I really need to start
>> with.
>> >
>> >     No legal advice please, just your experience with it and any
>> >     knowledge you'd be able/willing to share with the licensing of these
>> >     frequencies.
>> >
>> >     Thank you,
>> >     Brett A Mansfield
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to