AR platform is interesting just because of the sheer variations. 12in
barrel, 22 in barrel, folding stock, fixed stock, pistol grip, grenade
launcher, underslung breeching shotgun, cqb sights, magnifiers, long range
optics, cartridge variations (.22 to .50), IR pointers, IR illuminators,
etc.
Tavor works well for CQB (short) without sacrificing velocity, which is why
the IDF like it so much.
On Feb 20, 2017 5:51 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yea. Mine has a thermal sight and a holographic. By far the best rifle for
that type of use. And I fired just about everything the USMC had. If
course we didn't have the M4 them but that doesn't seem that impressive to
me.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017, 5:19 PM Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
> Tavor is a nice bullpup...
>
> On Feb 20, 2017 5:00 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That's funny because in my moving I packed up my Israeli Tavor and my
> shotguns. Yesterday as we were packing up a couple of the other bedrooms
> my wife found 3 guns I forgot I had.
>
> So I Probably forgot I had more guns than you.
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017, 10:21 AM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At least 2.
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 2/20/2017 8:01 AM, Cameron Crum wrote:
>
> And a gun
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> with a gun rack.
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 2/18/2017 2:19 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>
> That's one thing about living in texas. Everyone had a truck
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017, 1:46 PM Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That's the worst thing about being "the one" with the truck in a circle of
> friends. Everyone starts thinking your middle name is Bekins.
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 2/18/2017 11:42 AM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>
> I hate moving... I had a sticker on my truck... "Yes, this is my truck.
> NO, I am not going to help you move!! ". Someone tore it off.. My
> daughter bought new house last summer.... I helped move stuff and connected
> all her electronic devices.... Even marking boxes ,things disappear for a
> few weeks...
>
> On Feb 18, 2017 12:30 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Good,. Sold my house. In the middle of moving. Big bummer.
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017, 7:34 AM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Good morning Lewis, the coffee is ready, I added some cinnamon to it,
> Bacon on stove.... Making breakfast for wife... She works today, I have to
> stay home with contractors when they arrive at 9 ....how's your morning?
>
> On Feb 18, 2017 6:04 AM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry again.
>
> I don't think there will be any rail jobs lost. I know some people in the
> rail business and there is a pretty large backlog. Not that they are happy
> about taking freight of their books but I seriously doubt they will lau
> people off. The biggest reason is that their cost to lay their people of
> is quite large.
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017, 8:39 PM Robert <i...@avantwireless.com> wrote:
>
> I think the points on oil you make are valid. Your point that I have
> no clue, is a personal attack a) in that you have no idea who I am b)
> you have no idea of what I know or how I might know what I profess to
> know.
>
> You may debate that there are two factions controlling this effort and
> their motives but that isn't what you said. And that is what I am
> trying to get you and others to understand. This situation is exactly
> about what method to transport and the profits of those methods. Obama
> was backed by railroaders and trump is aligned with pipers.. I don't
> think he is "backed" but the partners he plays with are in the other
> camp. And the number of railroad workers put out of work by this
> pipeline isn't being considered by trump and after construction, it's
> similar to the other side.
>
> On 2/17/17 7:11 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
> > I don' think I made a personal attack. I said , in this case, you had no
> > clue. I think, being that I am always right in my own mind, that
> > statement is accurate. It isn't personal as I don't even know who you
> are.
> >
> > I obviously offended you and for that, I apologize.
> > It is fun to play conspiracy theory all day. In this case, the
> > conspiracy is really about buying votes and favor from voters and party
> > factions with policy. Yes, that translates to political power which also
> > translates to money. Lets be honest, doesn't about 85% of the crap each
> > of us do all day have to do with money? Obama didn't want the pipeline
> > because a faction of his party hated the idea. Mostly a symbolic fight
> > as pipeline or no pipeline the oil still moves. Trump wants the pipeline
> > because he made promises about jobs and again, it is a symbol, this time
> > about how gov gets in the way of business.
> >
> > In the end, the oil still moves. If everyone who hates oil and coal
> > would just stop using any good or service that benefits as a result of
> > those fuels the problem would be solved. Oh yea, you can't because
> > literally everything is impacted by one of those. Why, because to date,
> > it has the highest energy output for the cost. Address that and the
> > issue will take care of itself.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:27 AM Robert <i...@avantwireless.com
> > <mailto:i...@avantwireless.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, Lewis,
> > Shift to a personal attack.
> >
> > I am saying that there is a back story to a lot of this
> > enviro whacko
> > stuff. And the There is $$ that is funneled into that from those
> that
> > have that in spades. As there is money that is funneled into the
> other
> > side. That's the money that the Indians are getting. Yes Buffett
> > benefits from railroad transport, he has Yuge investments in the
> > railroads in the US and oil transport. AND, interestingly, he
> benefits
> > when coal starts getting transported in larger amounts. Koch
> brothers
> > still have huge investments in the pipeline infrastructure in the US.
> > Go back 20 years ago and it was estimated that they had direct and
> > indirect control of 80 percent of buried pipeline in the US. They
> have
> > decreased investment into pipelines greatly. But are still in the
> game
> > in a major way.
> >
> > https://cleantechnica.com/2015/02/10/transportation-
> game-keystone-xl-pipeline-koch-brothers-cant-let-go/
> >
> >
> > On 2/17/17 5:19 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
> > > Oh I got it. You have no clue, at least in this case. If you look
> > at the
> > > reasoning behind its delay it was enviro whacko appeasement. Not
> > saying
> > > Buffet didn't benefit but that wasn't the reason. Koch brothers
> > have as
> > > little to do with it being built as Buffet did with its delay. The
> > > current "build it NOW" isn't based on Koch contributions; its
> based on
> > > low hanging fruit for Trump to pick saying he is a winner creating
> > jobs.
> > >
> > > In the end, Pipelines are more efficient and safer than trains for
> > > moving oil. For other things, trains are great. Trains are great
> > UNTIL a
> > > pipeline is built. Having dealt with the indian nations over the
> last
> > > couple of decades with NEPA studies and the like they have no
> standing
> > > in my mind. They really couldn't care about what harm you might or
> > might
> > > not do to some ancient ancestral grounds. They base their bribe
> > request
> > > on what they think they can get out of you.
> > > I know...not politically correct. So what.
> > >
> > > Really, this kind of over simplification and demonizing crap is
> > what got
> > > us where we are today.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:14 PM Robert <i...@avantwireless.com
> > <mailto:i...@avantwireless.com>
> > > <mailto:i...@avantwireless.com <mailto:i...@avantwireless.com>>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Follow the money... Pipeline vs tank car is all about who is
> > profiting
> > > from moving the oil... Tank car is Buffett, Oil line is Koch
> > > brothers... Got it?
> > >
> > > On 2/16/17 5:31 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
> > > > Really? Pipeline? So you think carying all that oil via
> > train is
> > > safer
> > > > and has less a footprint?
> > > >
>
> ...
