Oh Jesus. What was his name? On Mon, Mar 6, 2017, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> we erected two 45s face to face attached by Unistrut and clamps buried 6 > ft down (5x5x6 pad) and went up 75 ft.. with 2 3 ft dishes...one at top and > one at 45 ft. solid....got idea from a radio guy from Coleman, Texas. > > > Jaime Solorza > Wireless Systems Architect > 915-861-1390 > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:46 PM, George Skorup <george.sko...@cbcast.com> > wrote: > > Yep, just sharing experiences. I don't think you'd have a problem with > 50-60 feet of 65G with a 2' dish and maybe a couple sectors. 65G is fairly > stout. Or what about a light-duty monopole for your application? > > On 3/6/2017 5:36 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > > I didn't say 55G, I wrote 65G... Would not even dream of trying to use > 55G at the height and the wind loading I have in mind. > > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:32 PM, George Skorup <george.sko...@cbcast.com> > wrote: > > I would highly recommend *against* using 55G free-standing at 50 feet. For > an omni and a panel it's fine. Not a 2' dish, especially not 11-24GHz. Been > there, done that. Customer installed it. Too much twisting in the wind. > > We have a customer with 2x 2' dishes with radomes on 80' of free-standing > 65G and it has been fine. > > > On 3/6/2017 3:56 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > > I'm looking at the Rohn 65G (24" face width) for a 50-60 ft self > supporting application. The site may eventually need more wind loading. > There is no room for guy wires or anchors, just a single concrete block > like foundation. > > Anyone have a suggestion for 36" face width tower pieces that can be used > in a similar application to the 65G self supporting kits? > > -Eric > > > > > > >
