Hi Ryan,

I’ll submit this to our SQA team as a bug and try to replicate.

Chris Trout
Mimosa Networks

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Ryan Ray <ryan...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Date: Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 9:47 AM
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers

It's on 1.1.2

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Rob Genovesi 
<r...@corp.coastside.net<mailto:r...@corp.coastside.net>> wrote:
What version is the G2 running?

I believe there was an issue on v1.0 that was later fixed.  Read up
here: http://community.mimosa.co/t/a5-c5-speedtest-ceiling/1793/6

-Rob



On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Ryan Ray 
<ryan...@gmail.com<mailto:ryan...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> C5 is negotiating at 1G but the router is obviously only negotiating at
> 100Mb.
>
> I don't see this issue on any G2's in routed mode or any G2's in passthru
> with a 1g client behind it.
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Rory Conaway 
> <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Are the ports negotiating at 1Gbps?  I just checked the client we have and
>> he has had peaks of over 40Mbps although 95% of his bandwidth is under
>> 10Mbps.  Turn it over to tech support and see what they say.
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On 
>> Behalf Of Rory Conaway
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 10:10 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>>
>>
>>
>> Weird, haven’t seen it but I only have 1 customer with his own router
>> behind a G2. I’m checking it now.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On 
>> Behalf Of Ryan Ray
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 10:08 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes. I can replicate it on multiple G2's, multiple 100Mb routers and
>> cables and multiple site locations.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Rory Conaway 
>> <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Ryan, something is wrong.  Did you try a different G2 or cable?
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On 
>> Behalf Of Ryan Ray
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 9:42 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>>
>>
>>
>> It was an after need. They wanted to implement a system with their own
>> router but needed internet right away. So I left a G2 and switched it into
>> passthru after they were ready.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Rory Conaway 
>> <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I’m sort of confused.  Why are you using a G2 if you have your own router?
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On 
>> Behalf Of Ryan Ray
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 8:04 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
>> Subject: [AFMUG] Problem with Mimosa G2 & 100Mb routers
>>
>>
>>
>> Not sure if anyone else is deploying the Mimosa platform en-mass but came
>> across a new issue today in case you're fighting with things.
>>
>>
>>
>> The issue: Client Router receives very poor download no matter what signal
>> conditions are like. Download capped around 10Mb/s. Upload was unaffected.
>>
>>
>>
>> The equipment:
>>
>> A5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced
>>
>> C5 – 2.2.1 Version – GPS Synced
>>
>> G2 in passthru – 1.1.2 Version
>>
>> Client Router – Asus N600
>>
>>
>>
>> The problem:
>>
>> G2 has an issue with 100Mb routers. Plugging in a 1Gb client into the
>> passthrued G2 resulted in full speed. Plugging a 100Mb router caused the
>> download to drop to 10Mb/s levels.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The solution:
>>
>>
>>
>> Replace G2 with regular power supply, fixed issue.
>> In C5 change the duplex from auto to 100MF, fixed issue while still using
>> G2.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to