My understanding is that they are being quietly rolled in and they are doing kevlar-like bags on existing containers...

On 04/25/2017 09:16 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
Are these being flown yet?  Last I heard they were just being developed.

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Robert <i...@avantwireless.com
<mailto:i...@avantwireless.com>> wrote:

    Combine this policy with the newer explosion resistant baggage
    containers...


    On 4/25/17 9:01 AM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:

        We've been remarkably politics free, and I want to keep it that
        way.  I
        know the answer to what I'm about to ask could devolve toward that
        direction.  I'd prefer we don't go down that path.

        What I'm curious about is this:

        The US is implementing various bans on electronics larger than a
        cell
        phone being carried onboard the aircraft into the cabin.  Today it's
        limited to a few countries, but it sounds like it's going to get
        expanded greatly.  Note that this doesn't mean you can't take say a
        laptop with you, but instead that it has to be checked so it's
        in the
        luggage hold instead of accessible to you through the flight.

        So the question I have is what threat this is supposed to eliminate?
        The obvious concern is some sort of explosive making it's way
        into the
        passenger cabin, but a wireless trigger for an explosive device
        is so
        simple to rig nowadays that I don't think the physical
        separation of a
        potential terrorist from their explosive is going to make a bit of
        difference.

        I can think of several other potential threats, but with the way
        that
        they're implementing this ban, I sure can't see how any of them are
        affected.   Especially since you can apparently carry your larger
        electronics all of the way to the gate, then have them gate
        check them
        to be returned to you airside at your destination.

        Does anyone have any ideas what threat they might be trying to
        eliminate?   Personally, I'm far more concerned about the risk of a
        lithium battery fire in the cargo hold....

        --
        *Forrest Christian* /CEO//, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./
        Tel: 406-449-3345 <tel:406-449-3345> | Address: 3577 Countryside
        Road, Helena, MT 59602
        forre...@imach.com <mailto:forre...@imach.com>
        <mailto:forre...@imach.com <mailto:forre...@imach.com>> |
        http://www.packetflux.com
        <http://www.packetflux.com/>
        <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian
        <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>>
        <http://facebook.com/packetflux
        <http://facebook.com/packetflux>>
        <http://twitter.com/@packetflux <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>>





--
*Forrest Christian* /CEO//, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./
Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
forre...@imach.com
<mailto:forre...@imach.com> | http://www.packetflux.com
<http://www.packetflux.com/>
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> 
<http://twitter.com/@packetflux>


Reply via email to