Yes, neg48 plant. I’ll send the requested info. Thank you!
> On 10 May 2017, at 16:32, Forrest Christian (List Account) > <li...@packetflux.com> wrote: > > If we're still selling the same version of a product, we warranty it. We > regularly replace things which are far older. I like to see the in field > failures so I can roll the lessons learned into the next generation of > products. > > Just send an email info cust...@packetflux.com > <mailto:cust...@packetflux.com> with the serial (mac address) and your > address we'll send a ups label to ship it back to us. Please include a note > as to what is wrong so I can remember when I look at it. > > Oh, one thing I just noticed. .. is this a positive ground plant by chance? > (I.E. -48) > > > On May 10, 2017 7:16 AM, "Sorin Esanu" <so...@evox.ro <mailto:so...@evox.ro>> > wrote: > We’re monitoring A and B of our DC power plant. It is wired directly into the > GMT fuses panel, A and B sides. > This particular unit was installed over 1 year ago, close to 2 years. If your > offer is still valid, let me know the procedure. > > Thanks! > >> On 10 May 2017, at 10:32, Forrest Christian (List Account) >> <li...@packetflux.com <mailto:li...@packetflux.com>> wrote: >> >> Can you let me know more about your setup? >> >> Is this the unit you bought in November? (In case this is something which >> has gone weird with a batch, and somehow not caught by our test procedures). >> >> If you've got a defective one, we'll swap it, paying shipping both ways. >> >> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Sorin Esanu <so...@evox.ro >> <mailto:so...@evox.ro>> wrote: >> We’ve experienced this exact same behaviour last week. It seems like PWR1 >> and PWR2 are acting like one now. >> We are in process of replacing all the SiteMonitor II devices with Tycon >> TPDIN-Monitor-WEB2, which can monitor more things and it’s a lot smarter. >> >> >> > On 10 May 2017, at 01:31, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:part15...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >> > I think I have a SiteMonitor II with a problem, as I always thought that >> > the two power sensors (PWR1 and PWR2) were independent of each other, and >> > should have a pretty high impedance between then. >> > >> > We set up a new solar site, and put our load on PWR1 and the batteries on >> > PWR2. As soon as we hook up either one of the sense wires, the breaker to >> > the batteries (30 amp) pops, and all the lights go out. >> > >> > We can monitor one voltage on PWR1, or the same or different voltage on >> > PWR2. However, if both are connected we blow the 30 amp breaker to the >> > batteries. >> > >> > We've checked the polarity (both voltages are negative ground), and they >> > are both "about" the same voltage (although we have monitored radically >> > different voltage in the past (like 12V on one and 48V on the other). This >> > is a 48VDC system, so we are seeing ~~ 56V on both right now, >> > >> > BTW, when we hook up just one of the sensors and leave the other open, we >> > see ~~ 43 volts between PWR1 and PWR2. I haven't checked other >> > SiteMonitors, but this doesn't seem right to me. >> > >> > >> > -- >> > -- >> > bp >> > part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc. >> Tel: 406-449-3345 <> | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 >> forre...@imach.com <mailto:forre...@imach.com> | http://www.packetflux.com >> <http://www.packetflux.com/> >> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> >> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> >> > >
