Completely off the mimosa topic.
I'm in middle America, home of the permit, I have to have a permission slip
to even have a gun. So my 11ghz license is pretty protected. Down on the
southern border, I assume you still have to get FCC approval, but is there
anything other than TOW missile to rectify interference from the south if
you put up a licensed link??
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I am not calling Mimosa B11 equipment junk by any means. It fits a
> need...it's an affordable solution which offers protection from
> interference with license and legal recourse...big plus...in my other life,
> I was sent prototype radios to test in this area which is noisy due to
> proximity to Mexican border (2 million folks) of Cd. Juarez, Fort Bliss ,
> Biggs, and utilities compounded by noise from 7 WISPs. Some of the up
> converted radios heard other radios in 2.4GHz and it affected converted
> signal like 902-928Mhz. Spectrum Analyzer showed it clearly...some of
> these became viable products with internal shielding, others did not. I
> appreciate Mimosa ,Cambium, Ignite and Ubiquiti efforts and innovation.
> Hell , 512k ptp radios were the cat's pajamas when I started in this
> discipline...
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Aug 17, 2017 8:16 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>
> “I’m with Steve” Hmmm, do I have enough courage to hang with Steve???
> Hangover part 4?
>
> *From:* Brett A Mansfield
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 7:33 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Figuring out what our FCC application says
>
> I'm with Steve. I just bought a couple B11s and they are going on a tower
> that has so much 5GHz that is very loud. If 5GHz interferes with it then
> I'm screwed.
>
> Thank you,
> Brett A Mansfield
>
> On Aug 17, 2017, at 7:27 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> So, there is potential for interference from 5g? If this is a garbage chip
> like that i dont want this gear. I wasnt behind the purchase, i want saf, i
> like saf, saf support is awesome, everyone in the saf sales channel has
> been awesome, even the saf guy who doesnt work for them.
>
> I got into junk gear im going to regret, didnt i?
>
> On Aug 17, 2017 7:23 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ha..not same animal...B11 uses same chip sets as 5GHz radios I am told
>> and up converted. It offers user a lower cost option. You pay what you
>> get for..
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>> On Aug 17, 2017 10:14 AM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I could give a crap about a snazzy GUI, and would much rather have a
>>> device that could run full modulation and full duplex. Prior to
>>> "experiencing" a B11, I'd never used a license radio that could not
>>> modulate at the full modulation.
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/17/2017 9:08 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:
>>>
>>> Steve, the interface is far more functional and simpler than most of the
>>> other licensed links. I can’t even get real-time bandwidth numbers out of
>>> them in the GUI’s which is kind of pathetic. The B11 and the Cloud are
>>> far more useful.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:53 AM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Figuring out what our FCC application says
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So we have completed the PCN on a couple mimosa B11 links (so very, very
>>> unimpressed with these radios interface and function) We went through
>>> comsearch. Trying to configure this, Im not sure what channel settings to
>>> put in. I went to the application, I see the centers, but no size. Is there
>>> a code on here that tells me what channel size we are applying for?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> And I notice the Application says the radio does not have ATPC, I
>>> thought these did, maybe im wrong
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
