So, there is potential for interference from 5g? If this is a garbage chip
like that i dont want this gear. I wasnt behind the purchase, i want saf, i
like saf, saf support is awesome, everyone in the saf sales channel has
been awesome, even the saf guy who doesnt work for them.
I got into junk gear im going to regret, didnt i?
On Aug 17, 2017 7:23 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ha..not same animal...B11 uses same chip sets as 5GHz radios I am told and
> up converted. It offers user a lower cost option. You pay what you get
> for..
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Aug 17, 2017 10:14 AM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I could give a crap about a snazzy GUI, and would much rather have a
>> device that could run full modulation and full duplex. Prior to
>> "experiencing" a B11, I'd never used a license radio that could not
>> modulate at the full modulation.
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>
>> On 8/17/2017 9:08 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:
>>
>> Steve, the interface is far more functional and simpler than most of the
>> other licensed links. I can’t even get real-time bandwidth numbers out of
>> them in the GUI’s which is kind of pathetic. The B11 and the Cloud are
>> far more useful.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On
>> Behalf Of *Steve Jones
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 8:53 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Figuring out what our FCC application says
>>
>>
>>
>> So we have completed the PCN on a couple mimosa B11 links (so very, very
>> unimpressed with these radios interface and function) We went through
>> comsearch. Trying to configure this, Im not sure what channel settings to
>> put in. I went to the application, I see the centers, but no size. Is there
>> a code on here that tells me what channel size we are applying for?
>>
>>
>>
>> And I notice the Application says the radio does not have ATPC, I thought
>> these did, maybe im wrong
>>
>>
>>
