As long as you can show into something on site, it will do the job... well, it would for me, anyway.
On Feb 1, 2018 1:17 AM, "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: > they do but it's not direct TCP like I would like (aka dedicated static) > but neat none the less, they have a very cheap monthly rate but they per MB > rate is very high compared to twilio and others > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> But if Hologram has a way to access the device like Lewis says, there's >> no reason to maintain a persistent VPN connection. >> >> On Jan 31, 2018 8:45 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Slightly more expensive, but t-mobile has plans that are $20-25/mo and >> "unlimited" rate limited 128kbps x 128 kbps after that. For a critical site >> $20/mo can be worth it. >> >> $2/mo is not a realistic figure if you're maintaining a persistent VPN >> connection, the $ per MB rate for those sort of plans is actually worse. >> Just the periodic handshakes and keepalives will eat through 20-25MB in a >> month. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 6:19 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: >> >>> Interesting...I didn’t know there were plans for $2/mo. That definitely >>> makes it worthwhile to have a backdoor LTE connection to towers. >>> >>> I’ll have to check into that >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:30 PM TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Never, but it's not a bad idea to have out of band management? I can >>>> get the LTE service for $2 a month + data used (ssh data = zero) >>>> >>>> TJ >>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Um how often are you loosing contact with your sites to necessitate >>>>> this LTE backdoor? >>>>> >>>>> Seems like a lot of overkill to make routing changes??? >>>>> >>>>> Am I missing something? >>>>> >>>>> -sean >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 11:48 AM TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>> Does anyone want to trade a PPTP connection (prefer you are multihomed) >>>>>> for the purpose of getting through LTE NAT? AKA I assign you a PPTP >>>>>> account >>>>>> with a static IPV4 and you do the same, so that if either of our networks >>>>>> go down we can use the others to tunnel back thru LTE to preform OOBM >>>>>> functions? We can shape @ 1mbps? >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a simple was around paying high fees for a static IP from the >>>>>> wireless carriers that even offer it... >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't really want to subscribe to some russian vpn service if I >>>>>> don't have to, or pay some cloud based OOBM company which will both cost >>>>>> way big$$$ >>>>>> >>>>>> TJ >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:32 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> You can use PPTP through NAT on LTE. You can assign a static >>>>>>> private IP to both ends of that tunnel. >>>>>>> If PPTP won't pass something you need, you can run an EoIP tunnel >>>>>>> using the PPTP IP's as the endpoints of the EoIP tunnel. You end up >>>>>>> with a >>>>>>> tunnel inside of a tunnel. It'll have a lowish real MTU, but you can >>>>>>> pass >>>>>>> 1500 bytes within the EoIP tunnel and it'll just be fragmented. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------ Original Message ------ >>>>>>> From: "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> >>>>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>>>> Sent: 1/31/2018 12:51:40 PM >>>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] OOBE mikrotik >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was wanting to add out of band management via LTE to some of our >>>>>>> core routers, but I think most/all cellular networks are NAT now so you >>>>>>> cannot access your LTE devices inbound unless you have it tunnel out to >>>>>>> a >>>>>>> public ip over VPN somewhere right? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How is everyone handling OOBE? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm half tempted to do it via VHF low throughput radios! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> TJ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >> >> >
