I think this is worth pushing to the nth. I like caselaw, fresh caselaw that stiffens historic caselaw. I would really like to see at the end of the day, the letter recipients divvying up airebeams assets with some sanctions against the attorneys office. We should do a gofundme in the industry for the recipients to afford the litigation, no settlement, no dismissal, make it get to a ruling.
where johnny Cochran On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: > I wonder how often this kind of thing works to just scare people off > though... I assume they'd eventually lose an actual lawsuit, but even if > the new guys know that, there's a good chance that they're not going to > want to go through the whole mess of getting sued, and just try to keep out > of their way. > > Personally, I think asking nicely to try to avoid interfering with the > stuff you have up would be a lot more effective... > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:48 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> Any local judge would be preempted by FCC. >> >> *From:* Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Thursday, March 1, 2018 7:20 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet >> >> Yeah, that letter isnt about fcc stuff, its about willfully impeding and >> incumbants operations. This fcc talk os what theyre probably expecting the >> people to focus on, but thats not their target. This could be interesting >> to see play out, hopefully it does end up in court just to get fresh >> caselaw. The new operators in the area may suffer a bit if injunctions are >> in play, but if they weather it, theyll win, probably get some time and >> trouble dough in their pockets too. >> >> On Mar 1, 2018 7:42 AM, "Chris Fabien" <ch...@lakenetmi.com> wrote: >> >>> They can't stop you, but they can sue you! Can sue anybody for anything >>> in this country right? >>> >>> In reality, I think the real answer is, the FCC rules on unlicensed >>> freqs and how a judge might interpret a case for damages due to lost >>> business due to provable radio interference, may be two totally different >>> situations. >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Send them the Part 15 rules...they can't stop you. >>>> >>>> Jaime Solorza >>>> >>>> On Feb 28, 2018 9:26 PM, "Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We cover one of the areas with Airebeam and we can’t install over >>>>> their old customers fast enough. Ken is backed up at least 3 times what >>>>> we >>>>> are backed up. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rory >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Steve Jones >>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:12 PM >>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> all you need to know about this outfit >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> " Today is a Great Day! I cancelled my Airebeam account and switched >>>>> to another company. This company has the worst customer service. They also >>>>> have horrible internet service. They are very unresponsive when there is >>>>> an >>>>> issue. (and if they did respond, they always blamed the router.) In my >>>>> opinion, Greg does not take the responsibility of owning a business and >>>>> providing quality seriously. >>>>> Follow up note: >>>>> When Steven (installer) contacted me to pick up equipment, he stated >>>>> equipment that wasn't even theirs. He then proceeded to yell at me. I >>>>> explained to him that he was never to contact me again. The owner, instead >>>>> of finding a solution, threatened to file theft charges. I am more than >>>>> happy to return their equipment, but I don't have to put up with their >>>>> abusive employees." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://www.yelp.com/biz/airebeam-arizona-city >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> not that BBB is legit, but there is this >>>>> https://www.bbb.org/phoenix/business-reviews/internet-provid >>>>> ers/airebeam-broadband-in-arizona-city-az-1000033070/reviews >>>>> -and-complaints >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Steve Jones < >>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> man, that sucks. He probably paid this lawyer too. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> wouldnt it be crazy though if this was a loophole nobody thought of >>>>> cause its too dumb to work, but we didnt take into account the level of >>>>> dumb in the judiciary >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Two guys in Arizona got them but my guess is these people are just >>>>> fishing. I’ve got my attorneys looking it over and I’m going to make an >>>>> inquiry to the Attorney General’s office tomorrow. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •** CEO* >>>>> >>>>> *4226 S. 37 >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=4226+S.+37&entry=gmail&source=g>th Street • >>>>> Phoenix • AZ 85040* >>>>> >>>>> *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>* >>>>> >>>>> *r...@triadwireless.net* >>>>> >>>>> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *“Yesterdays Home Runs don’t win todays games!”* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
