They use a lot of Ubiquiti equipment. Would be very hard to cut them off from Amazon for example. I know they have a large inventory of M series radios because our guys have taken them off the roof.
Rory -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Robert Andrews Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 11:46 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet I'd like to see the vendors decide that it's not in their interest to continue to do business with them due to the possible liabilities... On 03/01/2018 09:47 AM, Bill Prince wrote: > Down south they call it "All hat, and no cattle." > > > bp > <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > > On 3/1/2018 8:51 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: >> Yeah, it would be nice to see a ruling to stop this from happening >> again in the future... but my guess is that it's really just an empty >> threat, and he has no intention of actually suing anybody. >> >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Steve Jones >> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I think this is worth pushing to the nth. I like caselaw, fresh >> caselaw that stiffens historic caselaw. I would really like to see >> at the end of the day, the letter recipients divvying up airebeams >> assets with some sanctions against the attorneys office. We should >> do a gofundme in the industry for the recipients to afford the >> litigation, no settlement, no dismissal, make it get to a ruling. >> >> where johnny Cochran >> >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Mathew Howard >> <mhoward...@gmail.com <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I wonder how often this kind of thing works to just scare >> people off though... I assume they'd eventually lose an actual >> lawsuit, but even if the new guys know that, there's a good >> chance that they're not going to want to go through the whole >> mess of getting sued, and just try to keep out of their way. >> >> Personally, I think asking nicely to try to avoid interfering >> with the stuff you have up would be a lot more effective... >> >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:48 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com >> <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote: >> >> Any local judge would be preempted by FCC. >> *From:* Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Thursday, March 1, 2018 7:20 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this letter yet >> Yeah, that letter isnt about fcc stuff, its about >> willfully impeding and incumbants operations. This fcc >> talk os what theyre probably expecting the people to focus >> on, but thats not their target. This could be interesting >> to see play out, hopefully it does end up in court just to >> get fresh caselaw. The new operators in the area may >> suffer a bit if injunctions are in play, but if they >> weather it, theyll win, probably get some time and trouble >> dough in their pockets too. >> On Mar 1, 2018 7:42 AM, "Chris Fabien" >> <ch...@lakenetmi.com> wrote: >> >> They can't stop you, but they can sue you! Can sue >> anybody for anything in this country right? >> In reality, I think the real answer is, the FCC rules >> on unlicensed freqs and how a judge might interpret a >> case for damages due to lost business due to provable >> radio interference, may be two totally different >> situations. >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:13 AM, Jaime Solorza >> <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Send them the Part 15 rules...they can't stop you. >> >> Jaime Solorza >> On Feb 28, 2018 9:26 PM, "Rory Conaway" >> <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote: >> >> We cover one of the areas with Airebeam and we >> can’t install over their old customers fast >> enough. Ken is backed up at least 3 times >> what we are backed up. >> >> Rory >> >> *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On >> Behalf Of *Steve Jones >> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:12 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] anyone seen this >> letter yet >> >> all you need to know about this outfit >> >> " Today is a Great Day! I cancelled my >> Airebeam account and switched to another >> company. This company has the worst customer >> service. They also have horrible internet >> service. They are very unresponsive when there >> is an issue. (and if they did respond, they >> always blamed the router.) In my opinion, Greg >> does not take the responsibility of owning a >> business and providing quality seriously. >> Follow up note: >> When Steven (installer) contacted me to pick >> up equipment, he stated equipment that wasn't >> even theirs. He then proceeded to yell at me. >> I explained to him that he was never to >> contact me again. The owner, instead of >> finding a solution, threatened to file theft >> charges. I am more than happy to return their >> equipment, but I don't have to put up with >> their abusive employees." >> >> https://www.yelp.com/biz/airebeam-arizona-city >> >> <https://www.yelp.com/biz/airebeam-arizona-city> >> >> not that BBB is legit, but there is this >> >> https://www.bbb.org/phoenix/business-reviews/internet-providers/airebeam-broadband-in-arizona-city-az-1000033070/reviews-and-complaints >> >> <https://www.bbb.org/phoenix/business-reviews/internet-providers/aire >> beam-broadband-in-arizona-city-az-1000033070/reviews-and-complaints> >> >> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Steve Jones >> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> man, that sucks. He probably paid this lawyer too. >> >> wouldnt it be crazy though if this was a >> loophole nobody thought of cause its too dumb >> to work, but we didnt take into account the >> level of dumb in the judiciary >> >> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Rory Conaway >> <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote: >> >> Two guys in Arizona got them but my guess is >> these people are just fishing. I’ve got my >> attorneys looking it over and I’m going to >> make an inquiry to the Attorney General’s >> office tomorrow. >> >> *Rory Conaway **• Triad Wireless •**CEO* >> >> *4226 S. 37 >> >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=4226+S.+37&entry=gmail&source=g>^th >> Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040* >> >> *602-426-0542 <tel:%28602%29%20426-0542>* >> >> *r...@triadwireless.net* >> >> *www.triadwireless.net >> <http://www.triadwireless.net/>* >> >> ** >> >> /“Yesterdays Home Runs don’t win todays >> games!”/ >> >> >> >> >
