Yeah I ran across this guy because of his reliance on the combinatorial hierarchy. As there are a gazillion theories out there claiming to being covering theories for current physics, there is no way I'm going to bother with them unless they provide not only a great deal of simplification but also cover reproducible experimental results consensus theory has trouble with*. For an example of the latter, see "The Quantum Bubble" by Brett Holverstott <https://medium.com/discourse/the-quantum-bubble-8e9c3d9d1d92> wherein he describes 2 reproducible experimental results covered by Mills's theory that QED doesn't.
*I've made an exception for Christopher Langan's CTMU, not because of its purported relationship to physics, but because of its apparent treatment of language in a manner conducive to solving some deep problems with computer programming language design -- plausibly, at least in my mind, addressing the definition of a "natural Turing machine". On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 10:05 AM John Rose <johnr...@polyplexic.com> wrote: > Here we go: > http://www.tgdtheory.fi/pdfpool/intsysc.pdf > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8eabd59f2f06cc50-Mdc2a54673db32b721b7f15b2> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T8eabd59f2f06cc50-M163fe70f518bb888e1ade604 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
