On Mon, Feb 3, 2020, 2:48 PM Danko Nikolic <danko.niko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the opinions. > > So, I see a lot of disagreement. But let me try to accurate about what > this disagreement is about. It seems like nobody is challenging the idea > that no-free-lunch theorem contradicts the notion of general intelligence > (and vice versa). Instead, everyone seems to challenge the validity of the > no-free-lunch theorem. Would that be a correct conclusion so far? > The proof is correct. The assumption that all data sets are equally likely is wrong. We know a-priori that Occam's Razor applies. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T353f2000d499d93b-M466e7550644248793df41ff8 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
