Are you familiar with Marcus Hutter's work on Universal AI?

The general message there is: Truly, fully general intelligence is
only feasible with infinite computing power.

However, that's not really what matters in our physical universe, let
alone in the human world here on Earth...

Eons ago I aimed to formalize a more real-life-oriented variant of
Legg and Hutters formalization of the general intelligence notion,

http://agi-conf.org/2010/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/paper_14.pdf

The "no free lunch theorem" mathematically connects w/ the statistical
decision theory underlying Hutter's work, it's all essentially the
same story.   In essence, we may not get a free lunch but we can get a
cheaper lunch if we buy it from our relatives.  I.e. yes real-world
general intelligence has to do with biasing somewhat-general
intelligence toward the specific patterns in the actual universe the
intelligence has to deal with.   Deep NNs are a small example of this,
in that their hierarchical structure represents a biasing toward the
hierarchical structuring commonplace in our region of the physical
universe.

I tried to formalize the relation btw world/goal structures and
mind-structures here,

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Mind-World-Correspondence-Principle-Goertzel/ec4ca4401f38ec10d8d3cf40c39af0a4bfe86557

How useful this sort of formalization is for actually building AGI is
an open question.   My current AGI research is focused on
formalizations that bridge the math used in practical integrative AGI
systems like OpenCog with the math used in these sorts of abstract
formalizations...

-- Ben

On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 8:44 PM Danko Nikolić <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am curious to learn what the people here think about the idea that the 
> notion of general intelligence contradicts the no-free-lunch-theorem.
>
> Do you guys agree that a contradiction exists? If so, is that a problem? 
> Would that mean that no form of general intelligence could ever exist?
>
> Also, does anyone here undertake any explicit efforts to circumvent this 
> contradiction?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Danko
>
> Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI / see discussions + participants + 
> delivery options Permalink



-- 
Ben Goertzel, PhD
http://goertzel.org

“The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to
live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same
time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn,
burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders
across the stars.” -- Jack Kerouac

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T353f2000d499d93b-Ma82397489d5d483acb14b1ac
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to