You obviously don't understand Legg. On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 9:34 AM korrelan <korrelan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @James > > Seriously? That’s the example/ narrow pigeon-hole argument you are going > to use? That’s what prediction means to you? > > Your example is a calculated sequence, the answer derived from the next > logical calculation; it cannot be found from the prior sequence, hence the > whole concept of prediction is negated. What you require is a calculation… > or some magic. > > You will be telling me next that numbers (PI), mathematics, language or > even the perceived colours of the rainbow are native/ innate to reality. That > they aren’t a human derived construct/ concept… if no humans existed would > these concepts still exist? > > I think we both consider prediction very differently. > > K:) > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery > options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T353f2000d499d93b-M9c5361b237ddc3cc55b54512> > > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T353f2000d499d93b-M9462f2b71541b77f83f2fc62 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
