Matt With respect, your theoretical assumptions and calculations are invalid. The mass of any end device has nothing to do with ZPE-mode mechanics.
Second, you don't generate a black hole. It generates naturally via highly-specific zpe-mode mechanics.ZPE-mode mechanics is posited as a natural, dimensional unifier. It also contributrs to the emergence of biological consciousness. The human brain simulates it naturally. This is supported by Orch-OR theory. Hawking radiation is specific to black holes. The collapse of the zpe-mode wavefunction is not Hawking radiation. The horizon of the black hole relates directly to the Einstein-Rosen Bridge, and wormholes. Nextgen quantum processors are probably going to incorporate wormhole tech. ZPE-mode research is the hottest thing out. Still novel, but experimental for years. A fascinating field. My novel theory employs a ZPE-mode foundation. That's why a key prediction was tested for me. As a new cosmological constsnt, it works 100%. No big deal. It's just one part of the ZPE-mode mechanism. There are numerous parts and 4 distinct, entropic steps. On Mon, 17 Nov 2025, 07:15 Matt Mahoney, <[email protected]> wrote: > You extract zero point energy as Hawking radiation. Expressed in order of > magnitude Planck units, a black hole with mass m and Schwartzchid radius m > converts mass to radiation at temperature 1/m with power 1/m^2 until it > evaporates after time m^3. Your 2 Kg generator is about 10^8 Planck masses, > and would emit 10^-16 Planck power units or 10^34 W. This is about the > power output of all the stars in this galaxy. It will evaporate after 10^24 > Planck times, or 10^-18 seconds, after releasing 10^17 J or 25 megatons. I > understand why investors were skittish. > > To actually build a reasonable sized power plant like 10 GW or 10^-40 > Planck units, you need a black hole the size of a proton and a mass of > 10^20 Planck masses or 10^8 tons. The black hole would emit hard gamma rays > as powerful as a nuclear reactor core. It would have to be suspended in a > vacuum because 50% of any matter that falls into it will be converted to > energy. There is a risk of it swallowing the Earth, releasing 10^42 J, > which would destroy the Sun and other planets. > > Besides these technical issues, how would you even make a black hole? > > -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected] > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2025, 10:27 PM Quan Tesla <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Matt >> >> Please refer to Writer of the Mind's comment. The brief answer is: No, >> it's not perpetual motion. There are signficant technical challenges facing >> ZPE research, for example power output and amperes. However, I suspect >> those challenges have been addressed by dark projects. E.g, a friend passed >> on a recent mobile pic by vacationers in a remote area. Great sky viewing >> out there. Pic clearly shows what the observers thought was a "portal >> opening". My opinion was that it was a secret experiment in ZPE, and a >> Schwartzchild black hole was being formed in the Earth's atmosphere. There >> were whispy "chaotic-looking clouds" around it, which should be resident, >> quantum foam. I asked how long it was visible for, the friend relayed, ~5 >> min. That's pretty long for wormholes. In theory, they must be traversed >> within miliseconds. It must've been a most advanced experiment. Having said >> that, it may also have been the light playing tricks on their eyes. We >> don't know with certainty. >> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 12:39 AM WriterOfMinds < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, November 16, 2025, at 2:42 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote: >>> >>> Are you talking about a perpetual motion? >>> >>> >>> A ZPE device (I'm used to seeing the acronym translated to "zero point >>> energy") is not a perpetual motion machine in the usual sense. It >>> (theoretically) extracts latent energy from the quantum vacuum and makes it >>> usable. So it does not create energy from nothing, nor does it have to >>> convert/use energy losslessly. Technically it does have an input, just not >>> one the user has to provide. >>> >>> A lot of the usual questions still apply. Any free energy device that's >>> more than vaporware should already be making its possessor money ... >>> especially since you can sort of directly convert electricity into money >>> via crypto mining, now. Why is there a need to beg investors for anything? >>> >> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7ff992c51cca9e36-M512488030a9cff026f221625> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7ff992c51cca9e36-M425ad1c0161eadfb309ca6b8 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
