John I'll acknowledge with confidence. This is being done. The best delusion we can now step away from is the belief that any networked device is secure. It's probably not. All encryption protocols may have been compromised. If yours hasn't been violated yet, it may only be because it wasn't deemed important enough to do.
How did I come to suspect this? I heard about "cases", whihc may have been happening at more than one prominent AIs. Seems, for the past year, there were numerous incidents of unlawful access to "immutable, private data". Some users complained about private IP and data being scrubbed. Some alleged, the scrubbing was not only on the remote servers, but also via local drives. Okay, so a user session can be in-line intercepted and authorized shadow access gained, right? Right. However, for remote server backups to also be scrubbed? No user has access to that. No disaster recovery is possible. SHA lock protection - failed. Translation, some humans took it. Inside jobs? Maybe. Money buys anything. It seems that secure, AI collaboration, or the illusion thereof, may be extremely risky. Perhaps, us old-school relics may have to return to our old, proven ways. Offline and disconnected (cold wallets) still seem like the best form of security. Only upload what you need per work session, then backup offline. >From what others informed though, such practices may lead to credentials issues and users may find themselves cold shouldered by AI and even have subscriptions limited and near-denied (isolated). So, there may be a generalized harvesting and sublimation campaign out there, somewhere? At best, a conspiracy theory - old-world agencies now gone superhuman on AI? Only they would know. I believe what I was informed of. It sounded truthful. Welcome to the agentic world of superpositioned interference. There, I didn't deny any of it. The "facts" speak for themselves. Could this be a dawning reality? I think, the way forward points to RedAI, within proprietary, self secured, novel security-architecture frameworks. I have a novel security architectural platform that is begging to be developed. The result of decades of theoretical and componentized field testing. It's been buried restlessly in my head, never written down, not even detailed in my consciousness. Kept safe as potential, quietly updated as time passed, a niche hobby, one building block at a time. Should I even be divulging this much <= paranoia whispers. Recently, I took a decision - in the interest of the greater things - to start sharing a basic version thereof. Drip-drip style. Day 3 - all hell broke loose. It's still breaking loose. The quiet, easy life beckons, free of always-connected devices. Organic living is best. Less, is more. The smaller your digital footprint, the better. The less one knows, the better. Enjoy humans. Enjoy real connections. Enjoy being human. Settle for a healthy, socialized life. Idealistic? Let me iterate, networked systems and entities are probably going to have to faced a probability that all security protocols, inclusive of quantum keys could be compromised. That includes for quantum keys (Bob and Alice had an invisible friend all along). Different types of entanglement are theoretically possible. Therefore... The choice for the 2025 Nobel prize in Physics wasn't a coincidence. It was a thunderous signal. And then, up popped another scientist from a huge-ass technojuggernaut to claim rights to the theory. Yes, this all happened during the past 6 months. I checked out both theories, with AI off course. I'm not educated enough to do it by myself. Both checked out, and yes, the technocrats won. In essence, the whole drama had to do with quantum encryption/decryption, giving a very-loud message to those who may have been listening. I don't know if this "compromise" notion is true, but critical thinking was still free, last time I checked. Should "we" at least plan for the possibility of such a thing? On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 1:32 AM John Rose via AGI <[email protected]> wrote: > On Saturday, November 15, 2025, at 3:53 PM, Quan Tesla wrote: > > What I'm trying to say to you is, all you can do is take full > responsibility and accountability for what you do with your portion of > daily energy, with your life. Remain mindful that you're an inobservable > blip on a cosmological screen. A contributing blip, but inobservable none > the less. Now, choose life and make time to enjoy it, while it lasts. > Spoiler alert, it won't. > > > Yes of course those are prudent sensibilities. Wouldn’t it be surprising > though if life extension, healing, cloning/uploading and even AGI > technologies have already been in possession and in use by particular > individuals and organizations for extended periods of time? I’m not > asserting that they are though I’m stating that people in general have been > conditioned to vehemently discount and abandon any inkling of such > possibilities thus forcing them to settle into those particular choices > deemed as wise. > *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7ff992c51cca9e36-M6dc299e3221acbaba666a54f> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7ff992c51cca9e36-M78c43de2d4349547ffb1beed Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
