Could you explain the physics of your ZPE energy generator in terms that a person who knows a little physics can understand. There is no evidence that wormholes exist, nor does negative mass-energy, which would be required for their existence. Can you explain how you can change the topology of spacetime without introducing discontinuities? Einstein derived general relativity on the assumption that spacetime is locally continuous.
Please no BS. Point to physics papers that explain how this works. -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected] On Mon, Nov 17, 2025, 1:57 AM Quan Tesla <[email protected]> wrote: > Matt > > With respect, your theoretical assumptions and calculations are invalid. > The mass of any end device has nothing to do with ZPE-mode mechanics. > > Second, you don't generate a black hole. It generates naturally via > highly-specific zpe-mode mechanics.ZPE-mode mechanics is posited as a > natural, dimensional unifier. It also contributrs to the emergence of > biological consciousness. The human brain simulates it naturally. This is > supported by Orch-OR theory. > > Hawking radiation is specific to black holes. The collapse of the zpe-mode > wavefunction is not Hawking radiation. The horizon of the black hole > relates directly to the Einstein-Rosen Bridge, and wormholes. > > Nextgen quantum processors are probably going to incorporate wormhole > tech. ZPE-mode research is the hottest thing out. Still novel, but > experimental for years. > > A fascinating field. My novel theory employs a ZPE-mode foundation. That's > why a key prediction was tested for me. As a new cosmological constsnt, it > works 100%. > > No big deal. It's just one part of the ZPE-mode mechanism. There are > numerous parts and 4 distinct, entropic steps. > > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2025, 07:15 Matt Mahoney, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You extract zero point energy as Hawking radiation. Expressed in order of >> magnitude Planck units, a black hole with mass m and Schwartzchid radius m >> converts mass to radiation at temperature 1/m with power 1/m^2 until it >> evaporates after time m^3. Your 2 Kg generator is about 10^8 Planck masses, >> and would emit 10^-16 Planck power units or 10^34 W. This is about the >> power output of all the stars in this galaxy. It will evaporate after 10^24 >> Planck times, or 10^-18 seconds, after releasing 10^17 J or 25 megatons. I >> understand why investors were skittish. >> >> To actually build a reasonable sized power plant like 10 GW or 10^-40 >> Planck units, you need a black hole the size of a proton and a mass of >> 10^20 Planck masses or 10^8 tons. The black hole would emit hard gamma rays >> as powerful as a nuclear reactor core. It would have to be suspended in a >> vacuum because 50% of any matter that falls into it will be converted to >> energy. There is a risk of it swallowing the Earth, releasing 10^42 J, >> which would destroy the Sun and other planets. >> >> Besides these technical issues, how would you even make a black hole? >> >> -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected] >> >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2025, 10:27 PM Quan Tesla <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Matt >>> >>> Please refer to Writer of the Mind's comment. The brief answer is: No, >>> it's not perpetual motion. There are signficant technical challenges facing >>> ZPE research, for example power output and amperes. However, I suspect >>> those challenges have been addressed by dark projects. E.g, a friend passed >>> on a recent mobile pic by vacationers in a remote area. Great sky viewing >>> out there. Pic clearly shows what the observers thought was a "portal >>> opening". My opinion was that it was a secret experiment in ZPE, and a >>> Schwartzchild black hole was being formed in the Earth's atmosphere. There >>> were whispy "chaotic-looking clouds" around it, which should be resident, >>> quantum foam. I asked how long it was visible for, the friend relayed, ~5 >>> min. That's pretty long for wormholes. In theory, they must be traversed >>> within miliseconds. It must've been a most advanced experiment. Having said >>> that, it may also have been the light playing tricks on their eyes. We >>> don't know with certainty. >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 12:39 AM WriterOfMinds < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sunday, November 16, 2025, at 2:42 PM, Matt Mahoney wrote: >>>> >>>> Are you talking about a perpetual motion? >>>> >>>> >>>> A ZPE device (I'm used to seeing the acronym translated to "zero point >>>> energy") is not a perpetual motion machine in the usual sense. It >>>> (theoretically) extracts latent energy from the quantum vacuum and makes it >>>> usable. So it does not create energy from nothing, nor does it have to >>>> convert/use energy losslessly. Technically it does have an input, just not >>>> one the user has to provide. >>>> >>>> A lot of the usual questions still apply. Any free energy device that's >>>> more than vaporware should already be making its possessor money ... >>>> especially since you can sort of directly convert electricity into money >>>> via crypto mining, now. Why is there a need to beg investors for anything? >>>> >>> *Artificial General Intelligence List <https://agi.topicbox.com/latest>* > / AGI / see discussions <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + > participants <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + > delivery options <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> > Permalink > <https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7ff992c51cca9e36-M425ad1c0161eadfb309ca6b8> > ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7ff992c51cca9e36-M2d5e758af0d35868266e1f7d Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
