> -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Richfield [mailto:[email protected]] > > Mike is saying that no presently known mathematical methods can explain > GI, and I agree. >
He's saying this mainly because he doesn't know them. Though yes there are mathematical aspects of GI which haven't been adequately described. I find it amusing though as he attempts to describe AGI without mathematical handles, his GI grasps at symbols in its own way, that of which can be interpreted from a mathematical viewpoint. A system looking for an alternate to symbols in a world of symbols, trying to describe what GI does with symbols, without them :) John ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
