I think we have a loong way to go before we replace government officials with AI/AGI. First we have to have the AI/AGI learn and make a ton of mistakes before we give it any sort of authoritative role. IMO. ~PM
> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:41:53 -0500 > Subject: Re: [agi] Replacing Presidents and Secretaries with AI > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > I am actually interested in this because of the relevancy problem. > What is relevant and how do you decide if something is relevant to > some previously described topic. If some authority, like a presiding > officer, is the only one who can decide this then the authority may > base his decision on some insipid process like prejudice or > convenience. If it can be decided by a vote then the group's > prejudices and momentary purposes and fashions may interfere with good > decision making. > Jim Bromer > > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Logan Streondj via AGI <[email protected]> > wrote: > > One of the "near-term" applications for SPEL/mwak is managing, > > recording and summarizing deliberative assembly, tasks traditionally > > reserved to presidents, chairmans and secretaries. > > > > The members would interact in a chat with the Prez (president), > > who would make sure they have properly formulated "motions", > > and then would post them to the main room in order. > > > > Robert's Rules is fairly large and specific on many points, > > so much of it can be implemented in such a computerized setting. > > Of course any rule set or parlimentary authority could be implemented. > > > > A benefit over traditional presidents is that it would speak all the > > langauges involved with equal fluency, and provide translations for > > all contents likewise. Thus it can be used for international business > > and policy meetings/corporations etc. > > > > The Sert's (secretaries) main job is to keep an archive of current > > policy and meeting minutes, which then can be queried by members, > > either during or outside of a meeting. > > > > Of course we have to think about the current presidents, and chairmans > > who tend to be some of the highest paid people in an organization. It > > can be marketed to them as making things easier for them, such as > > translation, making sure people have properly formulated motions, and > > are generally following the rules of the process. > > > > The current presidents and vice-presidents don't have to feel > > completely obsoleted, much like how we still have drone pilots, for > > instance the president may choose which of several proposed motions > > will be heard next, and other decisions which they wish to maintain > > under their supervision, such as overiding time constraints or other > > rules at their discretion. > > > > Otherwise anywhere it is acceptable to follow the rules rigourously, > > the prez and sert could operate fully autonomously, in the example of > > online discussion forums, community documentation, and possibly even > > collaborative software development. > > > > -- > > Logan Streondj > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------- > > AGI > > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/24379807-653794b5 > > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/19999924-4a978ccc > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
